LogFAQs > #948211588

likehelly posted...

mead said it was a plutocracy

you said that's not what a plutocracy is

mead posted the definition of plutocracy proving that, indeed, he was right

you can't now say that the definition has nothing to do with what's being discussed when you started the discussion about plutocracy.

What? Mead literally randomly called something a plutocracy, I pointed out his wildly incorrect usage, he then posted a definition that showed that his comment was wrong because it had nothing to do with his point. Try to keep up, Helly.

It would be like calling their response shampoo and then, when challenged, posting the definition for shampoo. Sure, that's the definition of shampoo, but what the fuck does it have to do with the discussion?

---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.