LogFAQs > #947913472

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	DSPGaming General XVII: The Chargebacks of Snortre Dame
Nazanir 12/04/20 11:46:10 AM #456:	MasterVG782 posted... "If I linked you my hour-long review, would you watch it?" Even if I had played the game, I can barely stand watching him more than five minutes, so why would I want to stomach listening to his snorts and rambling for an hour? Every time I see something from Phil, I am reminded of the scene in Billy Madison, where he's doing the trivia thing and the MC says the "everyone in this room is dumber" thing. His "review" is just an hour long ramble. There is absolutely no structure to his "review", he is all over the place and very hard to follow. He tries to make a point but fails to do so every time. To be honest, I am not going to watch an hour long review from anyone, especially not from Phil. It's hilarious though, that Phil believes his opinion carries weight and that he believes even ABOVE that, that watching his review is mandatory in order to have a conversation with him about the game. How delusional do you h ave to be? Phil honestly believes here that any opinion other than his own is wrong, and unless you watch his video, he won't even try to have a civil conversation. He will resort to namecalling as he always does: idiots, brainwashed, moron, etc. This is also why no one in the games industry takes him seriously. He is utterly and completely incapable of civil discourse, hell, even friendly banter is something he cannot handle. Why on earth would any company send a person who cannot handle any opinion different from his own a review copy? All that surrounds Phil is negativity, and that is not something anyone wants to be associated with. It's not just that Phil is "the guy", shit happens. Just laugh and move on. The problem is that when you invoke the name "DarkSydePhil", it conjures up a myriad of reactions, but none of them are positive. It's either "the guy", the scammer who didn't deliver on his crowfunding goals (Project 7), the guy who needs stream to hold his hand, the guy who only talks negatively about other streamers, the guy who shits all over devs, etc. No matter what angle you use, I guarantee you, if you let ANYONE watch Phil, who hasn't seen him before, for 5 minutes they'll just click away. Phil often wants to debunk whatever is happening. But the core problem is that any association made with Phil, is a negative one. --- XboX GT/Steam/Wii-U - Nazanir <cite>Nazanir posted [p:947913472] in DSPGaming ... [t:79017931]...</cite> <quote>MasterVG782 posted... </cite> <quote>"If I linked you my hour-long review, would you watch it?" Even if I had played the game, I can barely stand watching him more than five minutes, so why would I want to stomach listening to his snorts and rambling for an hour? Every time I see something from Phil, I am reminded of the scene in Billy Madison, where he's doing the trivia thing and the MC says the "everyone in this room is dumber" thing.</quote>His "review" is just an hour long ramble. There is absolutely no structure to his "review", he is all over the place and very hard to follow. He tries to make a point but fails to do so every time. To be honest, I am not going to watch an hour long review from anyone, especially not from Phil. It's hilarious though, that Phil believes his opinion carries weight and that he believes even ABOVE that, that watching his review is mandatory in order to have a conversation with him about the game. How delusional do you h ave to be? Phil honestly believes here that any opinion other than his own is wrong, and unless you watch his video, he won't even try to have a civil conversation. He will resort to namecalling as he always does: idiots, brainwashed, moron, etc. This is also why no one in the games industry takes him seriously. He is utterly and completely incapable of civil discourse, hell, even friendly banter is something he cannot handle. Why on earth would any company send a person who cannot handle any opinion different from his own a review copy? All that surrounds Phil is negativity, and that is not something anyone wants to be associated with. It's not just that Phil is "the guy", shit happens. Just laugh and move on. The problem is that when you invoke the name "DarkSydePhil", it conjures up a myriad of reactions, but none of them are positive. It's either "the guy", the scammer who didn't deliver on his crowfunding goals (Project 7), the guy who needs stream to hold his hand, the guy who only talks negatively about other streamers, the guy who shits all over devs, etc. No matter what angle you use, I guarantee you, if you let ANYONE watch Phil, who hasn't seen him before, for 5 minutes they'll just click away. Phil often wants to debunk whatever is happening. But the core problem is that any association made with Phil, is a negative one. --- XboX GT/Steam/Wii-U - Nazanir</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1