Current Events > DSPGaming General XVII: The Chargebacks of Snortre Dame

(+) Yeah! (+)

Let us continue to laugh at the King of Fools!

@Vyrulisse
@Nazanir
@GiftedACIII
@Spooking
@Bad_Mojo
@WallStreetWolf
@Chev427BB
@DeadBankerDream
@Jagermeister513
@LightningAce11

---

*cough* *throat clear* *lean into mic and burp*

@MI4_REAL
@Nintendo_Porn
@MasterVG782

---

This man had the gall to tell his fans to appreciate his work when they said the streams were boring.
---

The amount of begging and whining has reached levels of salt I never dreamed of.

Tag, thanks.
---

Thanks for tagging me. Let the shitshow continue!

---

Tag.

---

so Kojima group are CE members?

---

Tag, thanks!

---

Thanks, dood.

I will never understand why these people give him money - did we ever get an answer from the one guy last thread who got blocked by him after giving him money?

---

The afternoon pre-streams are seriously becoming almost half of the entire stream

---

Pre streams means phil can ramble on and on about his woe is me schtick, get rid of trolls early, get lots of tips and cheers without doing any actual work.

Eventually phil's gaming will be replaced by a 4 hour long prestream.
---

It's annoying as hell because I'm genuinely having some fun with the crash playthrough but you end up wasting a bunch of your own time waiting for him to start playing

---

I actually did that Friday, sometimes I just like seeing it live in case he rage quits or something crazy happens

---

Joeydollaz posted...

so Kojima group are CE members?

Actually I'm with the super secret group The Daughters of Belmont.

---

What's the latest news with him?
---

The pre-streams are just DSP shooting the shit. They wouldn't be so bad if DSP had anything of interest to say. In other words; DSP refuses to overturn my ban. His final word was "I'm right and you're wrong. You're a detractor. End of discussion." Guess, I'm going to have to charge back some stuff.

---

Toger posted...

The pre-streams are just DSP shooting the shit. They wouldn't be so bad if DSP had anything of interest to say. In other words; DSP refuses to overturn my ban. His final word was "I'm right and you're wrong. You're a detractor. End of discussion." Guess, I'm going to have to charge back some stuff.

If it were up to Phil, he'd skip thr gameplay entirly and just talk. He loves listening to the sound of his own voice more than anything else.

And basically every pre-stream is the same anyway. He talks a lot, but never says anything.

---

https://i.redd.it/58n9q1ja94r51.png

Biggest hypocrite ever. How long was it he was being racist towards Asians and making Holocaust jokes?

I agree with DSP here that people shouldn't be saying that shit. However, I don't know the context of in which it happened. From first glance he turned off the audio in the game because someone in it said the word? That, IMO, is going over the top. If he banned someone from his chat for saying that, that I don't have any issues with that.

I do understand the hypocrite aspect of him, but I will never fault someone for trying to remain mindful of the words they use and how they can effect other people.

---

He went into overtime by an hour which was really strange. He said his wife was working but I don't know. He wasn't getting any tips either. This is just random speculation but maybe she left and he's getting lonely again

---

Phil is getting under my skin, in regards to Jasper.

He keeps spraying him, because he keeps chewing on cables and stuff. But that is because he isn't challenged/entertained enough. Instead of talking to your cat as if it is a 6 year old, pick it up and pet it. Or better yet, engage him. Actually play with him, use toys in a proper manner.

Phil also admitted to locking Jasper up in a room at night, so he wouldn't bite his feet. This is a cat that has no room to explore and go where he wants, something that is extremely important to cats, given their curious nature. Given that it is a declawed cat, it's not safe for him to go outside, but inside must also be misserable for him.

Also, Phil already retconned Crash 4's difficulty debate. He is now calling retro mode "classic" and he never said he would play classic. Just by calling it another word, he is trying to diffuse the situation. Phil always lies using semantics. Jasper is also a great example of this. See, Phil didn't lie just because people were right he had a cat when he said he didn't. He didn't lie because no one got it right he already had a cat for 9 months.

So because no one got it exactly right, it's not a lie. And now he is doing the same, by changing the name of the difficulty to classic (while it is called retro) but because no one in chat suggested classic mode (dumb people said reteo) he was right to choose 'modern'.

It is so fucking scummy, and it is so commonplace with him, that I am amazed that people believe him on his word anymore.

---

I agree with what you said but I'm lost when it comes to the crash conversation. He chose modern because the game really is absurdly punishing even on that mode. It makes no sense to choose classic unless you're a hardcore fan

---

Nazanir is saying phil chooses to constantly twist the truth to sate his ego. See the jasper example. He didn't "get" a cat, he got it months ago. Just pure semantics to rile up his fans.
---

WallStreetWolf posted...

I agree with what you said but I'm lost when it comes to the crash conversation. He chose modern because the game really is absurdly punishing even on that mode. It makes no sense to choose classic unless you're a hardcore fan

When Phil started the playthrough of Crash 4, he asked his viewers if he should play retro or modern difficulty. Pretty much his entire chat voted for retro.

Phil picked modern regardless.

Then the next stream he played Crash 4, he called the retro difficulty classic, and since no one voted classic...

---

I see what you mean now. That's pretty messed up but doesn't surprise me

---

DSP is very against any content for detractors now. He's become paranoid. It's consumed him. If a gave gives him any sort of challenge he does not want to play it.

---

Suspended on twitch yet again.
---

LightningAce11 posted...

Suspended on twitch yet again.

lmao

---

He still got 300 in tips, who cares if he got taken down again.
---

I like how his "I'm live" post on Twitter earlier today even has him begging for money. In fact, this whole day has him begging for money on Twitter.

---

Back on twitch, but the dmca helps him more than hurts him. He got almost $400, didn't play any games and just whined for 4 hours.
---

Also, he made 3.000 dollars worth of cheers in his late stream. Predicting now that this will never be adresses again come next stream. He once again will be "in the whole" (the new bills escuse) and will need as much money as you can give him.

He had the fucking gall to end the late stream by calling it a "rough day", after making almost 4.000 dollars in tips and cheers.

Unbievable.

---

Phil claims to have a bad back but during prestream he's rocking back and forth, side to side like crazy. What does this mean?
---

Low Key gotta admit how tired of him I am. He lacks self awareness...he's not fun to even mess with anymore.

LightningAce11 posted...

Phil claims to have a bad back but during prestream he's rocking back and forth, side to side like crazy. What does this mean?

He's a liar.

---

Now he apparently knows how rich/poor his viewers are. Says straightcashomie can't afford 1000.
---

The chargebacks/in the hole are the new bills, and the taxes before that. There will always be an emergency, or something bad happening why he needs more money, and he needs it now.

I have posted it before, but it bears repeating, Phil is using what is called the "sick system":

Rule 1: Keep them too busy to think. Thinking is dangerous. If people can stop and think about their situation logically, they might realize how crazy things are.
Rule 2: Keep them tired. Exhaustion is the perfect defense against any good thinking that might slip through. Fixing the system requires change, and change requires effort, and effort requires energy that just isn't there. No energy, and your lover's dangerous epiphany is converted into nothing but a couple of boring fights.
This is also a corollary to keeping them too busy to think. Of course you can't turn off anyone's thought processes completelybut you can keep them too tired to do any original thinking. The decision center in the brain tires out just like a muscle, and when it's exhausted, people start making certain predictable types of logic mistakes. Found a system based on those mistakes, and you're golden.
Rule 3: Keep them emotionally involved. Make them love you if you can, or if you're a company, foster a company culture of extreme loyalty. Otherwise, tie their success to yours, so if you do well, they do well, and if you fail, they fail. If you're working in an industry where failure isn't a possibility (the government, utilities), establish a status system where workers do better or worse based on seniority. (This also works in bad relationships if you're polyamorous.)
Also note that if you set up a system in which personal loyalty and devotion are proof of your lover's worthiness as a person, you can make people love you. Or at least think they love you. In fact, any combination of intermittent rewards plus too much exhaustion to consider other alternatives will induce people to think they love you, even if they hate you as well.
Rule 4: Reward intermittently. Intermittent gratification is the most addictive kind there is. If you know the lever will always produce a pellet, you'll push it only as often as you need a pellet. If you know it never produces a pellet, you'll stop pushing. But if the lever sometimes produces a pellet and sometimes doesn't, you'll keep pushing forever, even if you have more than enough pellets (because what if there's a dry run and you have no pellets at all?). It's the motivation behind gambling, collectible cards, most video games, the Internet itself, and relationships with crazy people.
How do you do all this? It's incredibly easy:
Keep the crises rolling. Incompetence is a great way to do this: If the office system routinely works badly or the controlling partner routinely makes major mistakes, you're guaranteed ongoing crises. Poor money management works well, too. So does being in an industry where the clients are guaranteed to be volatile and flaky, or preferring friends who are themselves in perpetual crisis. You can also institutionalize regular crises: Workers in the Sea Org, the elite wing of Scientology, must exceed the previous week's production every single week or face serious penalties. Because this is impossible, it guarantees regular crises as the deadline approaches.
Regular crises perform two functions: They keep people too busy to think, and they provide intermittent reinforcement. After all, sometimes you winand when you've mostly lost, a taste of success is addictive.
But why wouldn't people eventually realize that the crises are a permanent state of affairs? Because you've explained them away with an explanation that gives them hope.
Things will be better when... I get a new job. I'm mean to you now because I'm so stressed, but I'm sure that will go away when I'm not working at this awful place.
The production schedule is crazy because the client is nuts. We just need to get through this cycle, then we'll have a new client, and they'll be much better.
She has a bad temper because she just started with a new therapist. She'll be better when she settles in.
Now, the first person isn't actually looking for a job. (They're too stressed to fill out applications.) The second industry always has another crazy client, because all the clients are crazy. (Or better yet, because the company is set up to destroy the workflow and make the client look crazy.) The third person has been with her new therapist for a year. (But not for three years! Or five!) But the explanation sounds plausible, and every now and then the person has a good day or a production cycle goes smoothly. Intermittent reinforcement + hope = Someday it will always be like this. Perpetual crises mean the person is too tired to notice that it has never been like this for long.
Keep real rewards distant. The rewards in Things will be better when... are usually nonrewardsthings will go back to being what they should be when the magical thing happens. Real rewardshappiness, prosperity, career advancement, a new house, childrenare far in the distance. They look like they're on the schedule, but there's nothing in the To Do column. For example, everything will be better when we move to our own house in the country... but there's nothing in savings for the house, no plan to save, no house picked out, not even a region of the country settled upon. Or everything will be better when she gets a new job, but she's not applying anywhere, she's not checking the classifieds, she has no skills that would get her a new job, she has no concrete plans to learn skills, and she doesn't know what type of new job she wants to take. Companies have a harder time holding out on rewards, but endlessly delayed raises and promotions, workplace upgrades that are talked about but never get enough budget, and training programs that are canceled for lack of money work well.
Establish one small semi-occasional success. This should be a daily task with a stake attached and a variable chance of success. For example, you need to take your meds at just the right time. Too early and you're logy the next morning and late to work, too late and you're insomniac and keep your partner up until you go to sleep, too anything and you develop nausea that interrupts your meal schedule and sets your precariously balanced blood sugar to swinging, sparking tantrums and weeping fits. It's your partner's job to get you to take your meds at just the right time. Each time she finds an ideal time, it becomes a point of contentionyou're always busy at that time, or you're not at home, or you eat too early or too late so the ideal time shifts or vanishes entirely. But every so often you take your meds at just the right time and everything works perfectly, and then your partner gets a jolt of success and the hope that you've reached a turning point.

Cont.

---

Chop up their time. Perpetually interrupt them with meetings, visits from supervisors, bells and whistles and time clocks and hourly deadlines. Or if you're partners, be glued to them at the hip, demand their attention at short intervals throughout the day (and make it clear that they aren't allowed to do the same with you), establish certain essential tasks that you won't do and then demand that they do them for you, establish certain essential tasks that they aren't allowed to do for themselves and demand that they rely on you to do it for them (and then do it slowly or badly or on your own schedule). Make sure they have barely enough time to manage both the crisis of the moment and the task of the moment; and if you can't tire them out physically, drain them emotionally.
Enmesh your success with theirs. Company towns are great at this. Everything, from the workers' personal social standing to the selection of groceries at the store, depends upon how well they do their jobs and how well the company as a whole is doing. Less enveloping companies try to tie their workers' self-perceptions in with the public's perception of their brand. People do it by entangling their successes and failures with their partners', even when they shouldn't be entangled. A full-grown adult should be able to take his meds without his partner's help, and there's only so much anyone can do to make someone eat at the right time and swallow their pills, but he still puts the responsibility for managing his meds squarely on her shoulders. The classic maneuver is to blame all your bad moods on your partner: If they weren't so _______ or if they did ______ right, you wouldn't be so stressed/angry/foul-tempered.
Keep everything on the edge. Make sure there's never quite enough money, or time, or goods, or status, or anything else people might want. Insufficiency makes sick systems self-perpetuating, because if there's never enough ______ to fix the system, and never enough time to think of a better solution, everyone has to work on all six cylinders just to keep the system from collapsing.

Source: https://www.issendai.com/psychology/sick-systems.html

This is EXACTLY what Phil is doing, down to the letter.

---

lol, who keeps dropping 100k cheers.

It's time to catch up *snort*I got warned from some BS false claim and there was nothing I could do until I got my account back.

---

@Toger when you were a fan of phil and he would rant about how detractors are at fault for anything, would you or other people genuinely believe him?
---

I would actually say objectively detractors are at fault for some things. They are some toxic people that will go to extreme lengths for a pathetic reason. But I would also say Phil brought that kind of attention on himself. At the end of the day there's always going to be some things detractors to that I will always understand why Phil gets so angry and frustrated. Does anyone actually enjoy that he gets temporarily suspended for three hours every once in a while? It's just stupid and exposes a flawed system within twitch

---

https://twitter.com/TheyCallMeDSP/status/1313706616127012864?s=19

Phil now requires you to dox yourself before you can give him money. This man is so paranoid about fake donations and chargebacks, that you have to give up your privacy to Phil before you can give him money.

Also, it's mind boggling that the "no money for groceries" actually works. Almost everyone getsmpaid monthly, but for some fucking reqson, Phil cannot plan around this. The bulk of his income is from Twitch (subs and cheers), yet a few days after he gets paid he is already "in the hole" and doesn't have money for his groceries. And even EVEN if that were true, hitting close to 200 dollars per day should be MORE than enough to buy groceries for 2 people and a cat for a fucking week.

This is also AFTER the fact, that all his credit card debt got wiped. His income has stayed at least the same (argueably increased with the vest streak for example), and his expenses haven't changed. So either he is fucking horrible at managing money, or is afraid that if he doesn't have a crisis going on (the sick system from my previous post) that the well will.dry up, or he is just so used to lying about everything he just can't stop.

If people want to give Phil money, that is fine, but this scam is just fucking disgusting. Also,.Phil claimed 1.700 dollars in chargebacks...

Edit: @WallStreetWolf No, you real name is only going to be visible to Phil, hence why I said that you are required to dox yourself to him.

---

Can you blame him? It also can't be that seriously bad if twitch allows the function. It doesn't sound like people's real names are going to be flashing across the stream

---