LogFAQs > #946415821

GGuirao13 posted...

Yes. It's too much of a hassle to dispute them, and it's most likely not worth it.

It's worth it, imo. I mean, either that, or be a boot-licker for weaker intelligence than your own.

I just write a small 1 or 2 sentence blurb to remind them how pathetic they are for their obvious petty biases. And that being king of the ban-hammer means nothing in the real world. Just a little sting to remind them of their poor life choices that landed them in their occupation within this website's "Ministry of Truth".

Then just carry on.

I mean, if gFAQs was so concerned about conservative or moderate opinions on any particular subject, they should explain that in their rules better. Instead of maintaining a false disguise that anyone can speak about anything, supporting an internet of free expression; but secretly moderate based on a few people's "feelings".

For me, it's gotten to the point that when I get moderated, they don't give me the option to dispute because they know themselves they're trapped in a logic-box. They'll go 1-60mph, on some petty comment, just to restrict my ability to dispute. This is how child-like the mods here are, and to accept their moderation, you're basically conceding your own intelligence for someone lesser.