LogFAQs > #946375339

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Election 2020 Statistics and Discussion
charmander6000 10/27/20 4:22:46 PM #138:	That's what I mean, the SC has already said the states have the power to deselect/punish an elector. This was done in 2016 for three faithless electors where they were replaced or had their vote changed. The Washington faithless electors while fined still had their votes counted as that is the punishment in that state. It's not in the SC place to change the votes. --- Congratulations to azuarc for winning the guru challenge <cite>charmander6000 posted [p:946375339] in Election 2... [t:78796615]...</cite> <quote>That's what I mean, the SC has already said the states have the power to deselect/punish an elector. This was done in 2016 for three faithless electors where they were replaced or had their vote changed. The Washington faithless electors while fined still had their votes counted as that is the punishment in that state. It's not in the SC place to change the votes. --- Congratulations to azuarc for winning the guru challenge</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1