LogFAQs > #945919520

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 329: There's No Debate
Corrik7 10/16/20 9:23:10 AM #86:	TheRock1525 posted... You keep saying "HE SKEWED THE POLLS" but the unadjusted average in Wisconsin had Clinton with 46.4% of the vote and the "skewed" version had Clinton with... 46.4% of the vote. The issue was once again an under performance by the third party candidates and a massive amount of undecided voters (Trumps average was 40-41%). You don't have to raise the % to skew the poll. You can lower %s elsewhere. Under performance by the third parties? If the third parties did more, Hillary would have lost by more. They were siphoning her votes. Why do you think the Democrats spent so long working to get the third parties off the ballots in Wisconsin and PA and such this year. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:945919520] in Politics C... [t:79042418]...</cite> <quote>TheRock1525 posted... </cite> <quote>You keep saying "HE SKEWED THE POLLS" but the unadjusted average in Wisconsin had Clinton with 46.4% of the vote and the "skewed" version had Clinton with... 46.4% of the vote. The issue was once again an under performance by the third party candidates and a massive amount of undecided voters (Trumps average was 40-41%).</quote>You don't have to raise the % to skew the poll. You can lower %s elsewhere. Under performance by the third parties? If the third parties did more, Hillary would have lost by more. They were siphoning her votes. Why do you think the Democrats spent so long working to get the third parties off the ballots in Wisconsin and PA and such this year. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1