LogFAQs > #943491731

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicTrump is the Antichrist.
Kyuubi4269
08/17/20 2:04:17 PM
#41:


Unbridled9 posted...
You can't do a lot of things without winning/success. However you can lose individual battles and still conquer and you can still win without conquering (EX: winning a defensive battle). So while you need to win to conquer winning and conquering are not really related. Winning is way to broad while conquering is a very specific thing that, while related, is a bit distantly related.

Winning is absolutely essential. You can lose some and still conquer but that's from winning more. You can't conquer while losing more than you gain. Battles are unrelated to conquering as you don't need to battle to conquer, but you absolutely must win something, be it land or hearts.

Conquest is a type of win, you cannot separate the concept.
---
Doctor Foxx posted...
The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1