LogFAQs > #943425872

Corrik7 posted...

Using your analogy.

"We have a system that limits theft some in some areas but we want to really get to the masses, so we will no longer employ loss prevention or have any employees so customers can get goods as needed without waiting in lines or such. We trust them to send the check for what they take with their electronic signature for the cost!"

Like, you again are arguing for an extreme view instead of realizing this view isn't mutually exclusive. If you want to go to a more accessible system (though I would argue mail in isn't the best system then), you should want to also increase the check to prevent fraud as well which is easier to do in that system.

Would you accept having to undergo a patdown every time you enter Walmart because, say, one guy snuck in a lockpick and stole some video games in a locked display case?

Voter ID laws are overly burdensome for the problem they purport to address. And then you have bullshit like Republicans specifically choosing the forms of valid ID so that the laws will even more disproportionately affect likely Democratic voters.

---

Congrats to azuarc, GotD2 Guru champ!