LogFAQs > #943153240

You didn't understand what I was saying what was wrong with your argument. You were using something he was saying was being done wrong to say that it was right. Like, it's common sense.

He never said it was being done wrong before, Corrik. He very succinctly said the government wasn't allowed to send non-First Class mail for any purpose without ever asserting it had ever once been done before. I asserted that the statement was wrong because it is the government wouldn't be openly sending billions of pieces of non-First Class mail if it were true.

If I'm interpreting your moon man logic correctly, you're saying that because you came up with a scenario that both of our statements could be theoretically correct that my argument is flawed. This completely ignores the facts that such a level of blatant and self-reported oversight would be completely impractical and that there would be far larger real-world ramifications than anyone on earth is bringing up because you (perhaps choose to?) lack even a modicum of critical thinking.

It's far, far simpler (and mind you actually true) for either one of our original statements to be incorrect than what you are trying to propose to resolve them both.

---

"One toot on this whistle will take you to a far away land."
-Toad, SMB3