LogFAQs > #943068488

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSanders would've lost
Broseph_Stalin
08/06/20 3:06:09 PM
#54:


Jeff_Garcia7 posted...
It's how Kerry and Clinton got elected. Barack Obama was not a safe pick to win over a conservative imaginary friends. He's credited to mass turnout of non-typical primary voters that got him over the hump.

It was hilarious for the Democratic party to use the strategy of electing Hillary to win over Republicans in the suburbs. GOP voters have never hated anyone more. So are these highly paid strategists really that dumb or is the mask slipping off that their primary goal is to defeat lefty candidates.

Hillary lost the election because she under performed in conservative areas compared to Obama, not heavily democratic ones. Even then she lost the election by like 30k votes in three swing states.

Sorry but you don't get to talk about electability when progressives are literally the most politically inept group of people in the country. Stick to fighting for those D+30 House districts.

Jeff_Garcia7 posted...
Ah the good old conservative "polls are fake when they don't say I'm winning"

If polling doesn't match up with voting at all it would quite literally be wrong, yeah.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1