Their logic is so mind-blowingly stupid anyway. Putting aside the fact that the incident mentioned was self-defence (on the part of the officer) and didn't have anything to do with politics, the inclusion of people being murdered (or that are even involved in a murder in any way) would make the data worse than useless. "Pacifists have been linked to 5000 murders (but how many they committed, how many they were victims of, how many they witnessed, etc., no-one knows)!" Obviously in the article they're referring to murders anti-fascsts have (or have not) committed, as anything else would be idiotic. They separately consider people indirectly killed anyway.
So obvious, they made their entire article incorrect by not writing a more factual title, right? Is it that bad to ask for specifics? ---
livingdeadrpg.proboards.com "And no I'm not signing your twitter after this type of attitude so don't ask..." - IIINCORRUPTIBLE