LogFAQs > #941858812

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I think I would have prefered Harry Potter as a series more than movies.
Monopoman 07/08/20 8:11:53 PM #7:	InfernalFive posted... Yeah like others said making a TV series out of it at the time just wouldn't work. Maybe these days with proven hits like BB and GoT, but not back then. Well even BB was a more feasible show, Harry Potter is a tremendous amount of money on special effects meanwhile in BB you just need talented actors and a few large set pieces in certain episodes. GoT is the one that proved it was possible, with the huge amount of money HBO threw at that show. <cite>Monopoman posted [p:941858812] in I think I ... [t:78833631]...</cite> <quote>InfernalFive posted... </cite> <quote>Yeah like others said making a TV series out of it at the time just wouldn't work. Maybe these days with proven hits like BB and GoT, but not back then.</quote> Well even BB was a more feasible show, Harry Potter is a tremendous amount of money on special effects meanwhile in BB you just need talented actors and a few large set pieces in certain episodes. GoT is the one that proved it was possible, with the huge amount of money HBO threw at that show. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1