LogFAQs > #941549628

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 309: Putin a lifetime bounty
Reg 07/01/20 10:12:39 PM #43:	GentlemanGamer posted... In this situation, the lack of public response is just fine, these sorts of entanglements are not really the job of the president to respond to, the cold war business is all intel agencies, even if the 'fake news' claims are bogus. I actually generally agree with this take, but when we've got a president that's been so, uh, pro-Russia during his time in office, and the response he has given is to just scream that this is fake, you can see why people may be rightfully a bit miffed. To put it lightly. Especially when he represents the political party that claims to be strongly pro-military. Like, I don't think anybody's actually expecting him to do truly do anything on it, but is at least acknowledging it and denouncing it too much to ask for? <cite>Reg posted [p:941549628] in Politics C... [t:78817788]...</cite> <quote>GentlemanGamer posted... </cite> <quote>In this situation, the lack of public response is just fine, these sorts of entanglements are not really the job of the president to respond to, the cold war business is all intel agencies, even if the 'fake news' claims are bogus.</quote>I actually generally agree with this take, but when we've got a president that's been so, uh, pro-Russia during his time in office, and the response he has given is to just scream that this is fake, you can see why people may be rightfully a bit miffed. To put it lightly. Especially when he represents the political party that claims to be strongly pro-military. Like, I don't think anybody's actually expecting him to do truly do anything on it, but is at least acknowledging it and denouncing it too much to ask for? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1