LogFAQs > #940975600

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	7 ways we know systemic racism is real. Statistical proof and lots of sources
SKARDAVNELNATE 06/20/20 2:41:56 PM #24:	Mead posted... it just seems like youre really going out of your way too be defensive and pushback against anything like what is in this topic I suppose I could just say that I disagree with the article because it's stupid. But I prefer to point out the flaws it has. Unless the ideas presented are challenged we can't determine the strength or weakness of the argument. Just as with no one to refute my arguments I'm left to assume they are logically sound. Since there are people that would use this article to argue that some demographics are not as capable, deserving of special treatment, or owed some sort of compensation I find it very pressing to refute it and refine my own arguments against it. Mead posted... You really think every point being made is just wrong and theres no systemic racial unfairness in the country that could be made better? I think there are individual people making isolated decisions. As this article is presented it reeks of trying to convince people that a boogeyman exists without actual proof of a boogeyman being responsible for what they claim. If there are individual cases of racism then point to that. It would be a far stronger position than assuming that most people are being racist all the time without realizing it. Point to a person responsible, don't just heap responsibility on people who are not involved. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:940975600] in 7 ways we ... [t:78786892]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>it just seems like youre really going out of your way too be defensive and pushback against anything like what is in this topic</quote>I suppose I could just say that I disagree with the article because it's stupid. But I prefer to point out the flaws it has. Unless the ideas presented are challenged we can't determine the strength or weakness of the argument. Just as with no one to refute my arguments I'm left to assume they are logically sound. Since there are people that would use this article to argue that some demographics are not as capable, deserving of special treatment, or owed some sort of compensation I find it very pressing to refute it and refine my own arguments against it. Mead posted... </cite> <quote>You really think every point being made is just wrong and theres no systemic racial unfairness in the country that could be made better?</quote>I think there are individual people making isolated decisions. As this article is presented it reeks of trying to convince people that a boogeyman exists without actual proof of a boogeyman being responsible for what they claim. If there are individual cases of racism then point to that. It would be a far stronger position than assuming that most people are being racist all the time without realizing it. Point to a person responsible, don't just heap responsibility on people who are not involved. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1