LogFAQs > #940626588

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Diaper Force strike again as they fatally shoot an unarmed black man in the back
Chicken 06/13/20 6:14:07 PM #41:	Tsuyoi3 posted... He wasn't a danger to the public, so he constituted no threat to public safety. He wasn't going to go around tasing people. Attacking officers and stealing a taser is monumentally stupid, but does not warrant killing. He would have to run, and could be pursued, and eventually successfully tased. He would then face additional charges for assaulting an officer and presumably theft. Instead they decided to shoot a fleeing man in the back. The choice of cowards without honor. Why would someone steal a weapon if they had no intention of using it? You make it sound like people make sound decisions while drunk. --- May contain bones https://youtu.be/jGbI0P4hh3o <cite>Chicken posted [p:940626588] in Diaper For... [t:78769232]...</cite> <quote>Tsuyoi3 posted... </cite> <quote>He wasn't a danger to the public, so he constituted no threat to public safety. He wasn't going to go around tasing people. Attacking officers and stealing a taser is monumentally stupid, but does not warrant killing. He would have to run, and could be pursued, and eventually successfully tased. He would then face additional charges for assaulting an officer and presumably theft. Instead they decided to shoot a fleeing man in the back. The choice of cowards without honor.</quote>Why would someone steal a weapon if they had no intention of using it? You make it sound like people make sound decisions while drunk. --- May contain bones https://youtu.be/jGbI0P4hh3o</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1