LogFAQs > #940002699

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What's the most powerful country in the world?
Kyuubi4269 05/31/20 9:12:18 PM #37:	Zeus posted... What? If you're claiming they "exploited" WWII, it's a claim that doesn't make any sense. The US was in a better state at the end of the war because the battles had largely taken place in other nations. They benefited from the rest of the world having hardship, but there was nothing to "exploit" Profiteering off a fight they were duty-bound to join to the point of making "allies" fail from being completely scammed for basic supplies. Their greed and insistence to force Japan to get it's oil from them forced Japan to enter the war, instigating further atrocities. Zeus posted... I'm not sure what you consider "inefficiencies" although I suspect you consider overt colonialism an "efficiency" and are knocking the US for not just conquering the nations then looting them. Take the objective and fuck right off ASAP, not propagate a false war to keep the military industrial complex relevant. The point of war to force a conclusion ASAP, it is not to keep fighting and spend their excess soldiers. Zeus posted... The US could easily beat Vietnam and Iran even without nukes. Explains why they failed to make ground. Zeus posted... So basically you think that unless a war is profitable, it's wasteful? >_> Unless you're taking over the land and government, wars generally aren't going to be directly profitable. Wars are explicitly for profit. Without profit there's no motive and no end. The US failed to achieve a profitable conclusion every single time it's warred since WWII. Zeus posted... Really drinking the kool-aid there. Says the 'murican claiming Drumpf's personal playground is respectable. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas. <cite>Kyuubi4269 posted [p:940002699] in What's... [t:78734943]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>What? If you're claiming they "exploited" WWII, it's a claim that doesn't make any sense. The US was in a better state at the end of the war because the battles had largely taken place in other nations. They benefited from the rest of the world having hardship, but there was nothing to "exploit"</quote> Profiteering off a fight they were duty-bound to join to the point of making "allies" fail from being completely scammed for basic supplies. Their greed and insistence to force Japan to get it's oil from them forced Japan to enter the war, instigating further atrocities. Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>I'm not sure what you consider "inefficiencies" although I suspect you consider overt colonialism an "efficiency" and are knocking the US for not just conquering the nations then looting them.</quote> Take the objective and fuck right off ASAP, not propagate a false war to keep the military industrial complex relevant. The point of war to force a conclusion ASAP, it is not to keep fighting and spend their excess soldiers. Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>The US could easily beat Vietnam and Iran even without nukes.</quote> Explains why they failed to make ground. Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>So basically you think that unless a war is profitable, it's wasteful? >_> Unless you're taking over the land and government, wars generally aren't going to be directly profitable.</quote> Wars are explicitly for profit. Without profit there's no motive and no end. The US failed to achieve a profitable conclusion every single time it's warred since WWII. Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Really drinking the kool-aid there.</quote> Says the 'murican claiming Drumpf's personal playground is respectable. --- Doctor Foxx posted... The demonizing of soy has a lot to do with xenophobic ideas.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1