LogFAQs > #939864867

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHow more longer would WW2 have lasted?
ScazarMeltex
05/28/20 11:26:31 PM
#31:


UnfairRepresent posted...
Ehh

Doubtful.

I mean history would be different sure but there was no realistic way Germany was winning that fight.

I don't have the exact quote a famous historian said something along the lines of "Germany's plans hinged on absolutely everything that could go right, going right for them and everything that could go wrong for the enemies going wrong."

Trying to take the UK was a hassle, Trying to take Africa was a hassle, Trying to protect Italy was a hassle, trying to maintain what land they did take was a hassle, supply shortages were a hassle.

Throw in the notions of the US or Russia being impossible for Germany to take... they were kind of fucked even without Hitler's incompotence.
There are a couple of moments where things could have gone very differently. Primarily by the Germans winning the war against Russia but the one that really sticks in my mind is Hitler not listening to Guderian in 41 about diverting the Panzer divisions of Army Group Center to assist in the liquidation of the Kiev pocket.

What it boils down to is Hitler was concerned about the speed with with German mobile formations were getting ahead of the infantry. He was also concerned about the size of the Russian forces trapped within the Kiev pocket. He ordered Guderian to take his panzer formations from where they were in army group center all the way to Kiev to assist in the assault on Kiev. Guderian argued that such a drive would already exacerbate the existing problems caused by the panzer formations being in continuous operation for months. The dire need for maintenance and refitting that was already causing breakdowns of large numbers of vehicles. Hitler overruled him, Guderian did what he was told, Kiev was taken along with a ridiculous number of prisoners, vehicles, and artillery. Then he took the tanks back up to the staging ground for the assault on Moscow. By then it was too late. They had to delay the attack to do the maintenance and refitting that Guderian had told Hitler would have to be done. That delay allowed the Russian fall rains to wreck the road network. Then the drive on Moscow began. With winter coming quickly, the effort seemed fraught with the risk of over-extending and leaving his command subject to counter-attack. He was ordered to proceed anyway. They made it to the outskirts then were forced back.

It's very likely had Hitler listened to Guderian and the other Army Group Center Generals, they could have taken Moscow and with that crippled Russia ability to fight the war. Moscow was a major center of arms production, the center of the Soviet communications system and an important transport hub, not to mention the crushing effect it would have had on Soviet morale. As it was they gave the Russians time to fortify and bring up veteran troops from Siberia to stiffen the defenses of Moscow.

EDIT: There are some interesting things on the subject Gurderian talks about in his memoirs, but the highlights of said memoirs are the really absurd shit like in 45 when everything is falling apart Hitler suggests the creation of two man anti-tank teams on Bicycles. One guy drives the bike, the other guy has a bazooka. Or during the retreat from Moscow Hitler orders Guderian's troops to stand fast, Guderian goes to Hitler's headquarters to protest. Hitler tells Guderian to just dig in and drive the enemy back with concentrated artillery fire like they did in WW1. Guderian tells him that the ground is too damn frozen to dig in. Hitler suggests using artillery shells to blast foxholes. Guderian says ok cool, but then we won't have enough for the guns to help hold the positions. Hitler screeches, throws a hissy fit, and kicks Guderian out.

---
"If you wish to converse with me define your terms"
Voltaire
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1