LogFAQs > #939862862

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHow more longer would WW2 have lasted?
BaphometFlux
05/28/20 10:40:07 PM
#6:


ScazarMeltex posted...
I mean, this is something that's almost impossible to theorize on any specific set of consequences. No invasion of Russia completely alters the war. Africa was treated as a secondary front by Hitler because he was preoccupied with planning and conducting operations in Russia. If he'd been willing to send even 3 or 4 more divisions and ensure an adequate supply of fuel the British get chased out of that front altogether.

There's also the fact that the majority of the German military was defeated fighting the Russians and the majority of men and material went there, and the vast majority of manufacturing operations were conducted with that in mind. With those resources not engaged in fighting Russia they could have engaged in large scale ship building operations to help choke off the UK from it's colonial resources and plane building operations to further the bombing campaign against the UK. Without assistance from abroad the UK would have been forced to surrender eventually.

It doesn't have to be 100% accurate prediction , how much longer would you have given Germany? or would Germany had won the war eventually?

---
"Shisaanputa"
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1