LogFAQs > #939764426

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicLife After Geeks
CyborgSage00x0
05/27/20 1:04:12 AM
#22:


I agree with my choices, that's all that matters!

Also everybody should officially forget about the Snyder cut of Justice League because apparently there's a Paul Feig cut of Ghostbusters >_>

https://bleedingcool.com/movies/ghostbusters-2016-three-hour-cut-feig-snyder-cut/

It's 3.5 hours long! Think of everything they compromised and cut to get it down to the 2hr14 theatrical run!

Sweet Jesus, no. Also, cute of that article to call the movie a "moderate success." It was a box office bomb that cost the studio at least $75M, according to Wikipedia. Pretty much everyone has moved on and agreed that the movie was trash at this point. Absolutely no one is demanding an extended cut of Ghostbusters 2016.

ParanoidObsessive posted...
The problem is, you need somewhere around 70% to develop effective herd immunity. Essentially, at the current rate, we'd have to stay in self-isolation for something like 7 years (at which point, the economy would be a smoking crater and most of us would be pretty much fucked anyway).

Herd immunity is likely moot, anyways, due to the number of people that had COVID, only to get it again. In some cases, just weeks after getting over it. Anti-bodies have to work for herd immunity to even occur, and so far, the virus' ability to rapidly mutate has left that in doubt. That, and the last possibly permanent damage (mostly to the lungs) means the idea if exposure for herd immunity likely doesn't pass a cost-benefit check.

---
PotD's resident Film Expert.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1