LogFAQs > #938251351

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Boy that SephG topic didn't last very long, did it?
Corrik7 04/28/20 2:55:26 PM #100:	Inviso posted... Ah yes, "sarcasm". I wasn't trolling/lying, I was just being sarcastic. Just like Trump's "I wasn't literally telling people to inject disinfectant into their veins, I was just being sarcastic" claim. Red's post says to stop whining because Sephy can't live the high standard of life he's accustomed to (see: being able to go to his favorite bar on Friday nights), and his temporary happiness is not worth more than the lives saved by quarantine practices. Sephy's post deliberately misrepresents what Red said, painting him as an uncaring monster, while simultaneously downplaying ANY positive reasons as to why someone might be in favor of the quarantine. That's blatant trolling, and the moderation is deserved, ESPECIALLY from someone with a repeated history of such offenses. His post ends with sarcasm. Clear as day. He says there is empathy on both sides of the lockdown ball. Red is choosing empathy for those who may possibly die to it while Sephy is talking about empathy towards those who may die to addiction, suicide, poverty, etc. It is a fair debate that everyone should have and every governor should be weighing in their choices right now. Then he sarcastically responds that empathy towards them shouldn't matter because high and mighty intellectual red deems it so and will save the world. Like there is literally nothing wrong with this post. I mean, is the argument that him sarcastically calling red an intellectual was flaming? That is literally the closest you are going to get to a moderation with the post. Red's post clearly, while a flimsy moderation at best and one I wouldn't make, is more of a degree of flaming than Sephy's. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1) <cite>Corrik7 posted [p:938251351] in Boy that S... [t:78633854]...</cite> <quote>Inviso posted... </cite> <quote>Ah yes, "sarcasm". I wasn't trolling/lying, I was just being sarcastic. Just like Trump's "I wasn't literally telling people to inject disinfectant into their veins, I was just being sarcastic" claim. Red's post says to stop whining because Sephy can't live the high standard of life he's accustomed to (see: being able to go to his favorite bar on Friday nights), and his temporary happiness is not worth more than the lives saved by quarantine practices. Sephy's post deliberately misrepresents what Red said, painting him as an uncaring monster, while simultaneously downplaying ANY positive reasons as to why someone might be in favor of the quarantine. That's blatant trolling, and the moderation is deserved, ESPECIALLY from someone with a repeated history of such offenses.</quote>His post ends with sarcasm. Clear as day. He says there is empathy on both sides of the lockdown ball. Red is choosing empathy for those who may possibly die to it while Sephy is talking about empathy towards those who may die to addiction, suicide, poverty, etc. It is a fair debate that everyone should have and every governor should be weighing in their choices right now. Then he sarcastically responds that empathy towards them shouldn't matter because high and mighty intellectual red deems it so and will save the world. Like there is literally nothing wrong with this post. I mean, is the argument that him sarcastically calling red an intellectual was flaming? That is literally the closest you are going to get to a moderation with the post. Red's post clearly, while a flimsy moderation at best and one I wouldn't make, is more of a degree of flaming than Sephy's. --- Xbox Live User Name - Corrik Currently playing: Spider-Man (PS4), Quantum Break (X1)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1