LogFAQs > #935794643

transience posted...

I see your point, but that's not true for me and Master Chief.

Okay well, hypothetically speaking then, were someone to pick Sub-Zero there and do so in a way that the pick makes sense (as you can do by comparing to Scorpion and explaining why Sub-Zero should be more popular, as you did) and it panned out I think it's worth considering regardless of whether there's a pattern.

I just think that trying to discredit every pick that fits a pattern as biased is inherently pretty negative. It's like trying to find an excuse to give someone flak for literally every pick involving the character or game they like unless they pick against it which hey as you've given examples of isn't necessarily always the right move either.

Like you can hold all the 51-49 Dante and Master Chief losses against me you want but at the same time I don't feel it's fair to say calling Master Chief to do extremely well (and Dante to a lesser extent, though his was largely in pathing) in four ways should just be discredited cause I like picking the guys in debatable matches since it's still calling something correctly, and for all the poking I get for these picks it's not like I'm picking 60-40s wrong very often. They're all fairly close losses-- extremely close in many cases.

---

No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!