LogFAQs > #935197276

Sounds like kind of a post hoc argument. Is somebody addicted only at the point when it becomes a major disruption to their lives to the exclusion of the escalation that's led to that moment? And is it purely a means-based argument? If somebody's means exceed an unreasonable action, does that they aren't addicted? Otherwise, given that I have as much as I do -- and often as poorly organized as it is -- I really shouldn't be picking up more at all. That's not purely a gambling aspect, though.

---

(\/)(\/)|-|
There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist.