LogFAQs > #933155047

Lokarin posted...

The syllogism is the combination of your two premises and your conclusion

Premise 1: All fish are mammals (all A are B)
Premise 2: Some mammals are poisonous (Some B are C)
Conclusion: Some fish are poisonous (Some A are C)

When you represent the categories in a venn diagram, you can rapidly see that the category "Poisonous" is nebulous within this logical syllogism. It's possible that all of the poisonous mammals are non-fish due to this, it's also possible that all the poisonus mammals ARE fish (which would make the syllogism true as well, although incomplete)

How is my link irrelevant then. It proves that premise 1 implies premise 2

GanonsSpirit posted...

TC is the person on the street corner ranting about how we used to have triple helix DNA, but aliens took away one of the helices.

if aliens had been to earth already they would have helped us to establish stateless communism. they are simply observing us from the moonship to determine when/whether to intervene


---

http://boomeressentials.com/.well-known/
https://essentialboomer.guide/robots.txt #NotAllGamers #YesAllLandlords