LogFAQs > #932527547

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Are the shittiest nukes still stronger than the most powerful alternatives?
Zeus 01/06/20 12:16:18 AM #6:	SinisterSlay posted... Nukes are terrible weapons though. They are great for killing civilians and that's about it Uh, what? Weapons that decimate large areas are pretty damn effective. As for killing civilians, you're better off just going with chemical weapons. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:932527547] in Are the sh... [t:78308766]...</cite> <quote>SinisterSlay posted... </cite> <quote>Nukes are terrible weapons though. They are great for killing civilians and that's about it</quote> Uh, what? Weapons that decimate large areas are pretty damn effective. As for killing civilians, you're better off just going with chemical weapons. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1