LogFAQs > #932217766

I really wish that GameFAQs didn't outright ban one of the strongest four-letter words in the vulgarity dictionary. I love using it as a Australian, and I would apply it heavily to this fucking police-cop.

So he feared for his life because a dog barked at him. He then went to shoot that family dog to death, but he missed, and he shot a nine year old girl instead. That alone makes him a jumpy, negligent piece of shit.

The fact that he went to court, argued that he was within his rights to shoot the dog dead and that he shouldn't be charged for accidentally shooting a nine year old? And that this line if reasoning was upheld? It's a fucking travesty. You wouldn't expect this level of delusion from a mailman, or a firefighter - both professions I strongly believe would have been charged severely for an incident like this - "I went to kill a dog because it was threatening me, and I hit a child instead". But a cop gets his day in court to argue that he shouldn't be punished for putting a bullet into a 9 year old - after aiming to slaughter their family pet - and he gets off scot free. Fuck off.

He wasn't there to bust a bunch of crack dealers, he wasn't there to start playing Rambo against the bad guys. He was there for a welfare check, went to shoot a dog and shot a child instead. He should be charged with negligence at best, and the fact that this scum walked is absolutely indefensible.

---

Snap your fingers, I'll come running, and leave again when you're bored.
Now Playing: Borderlands 2, Skyrim, Assassin's Creed