LogFAQs > #930708142

TheGleamEyes posted...

My source was compiled and issued before Trump even took office. Published on 10/31/2016, and having been in review/discussion 2 months earlier, since June 10, 2016.

Yeah, and the conditions they cite for why to allow STI no longer hold.

TheGleamEyes posted...

And feel free to post whatever sections you feel is relevant that I happened to omit, using the link I posted, to prove how STI were unavailable during the Obama administration.

You didn't omit anything, you just bolded around the parts where they cite the short term nature of the insurance and the existence of an individual mandate as reasons to allow it. You just bolded the parts saying it's allowed.

But if you actually read what you posted and then read what I posted, you can see that what you posted is a really strong indication of how the administration has specifically undermined the ACA. If you read your link, you can understand what the adminstration has done just by looking at what your link says about why STI should exist and reversing it.

TheGleamEyes posted...

I'll even use your own link; of the 2018 lawsuit attempting to stop expansions of STI offerings, meaning that the Trump administration used existing STI parameters as the foundation to create new guidelines off of (expanded date, etc.)

Right, so like I said, this situation only happened because of the trump adminstration. What part of this conversation or reality are confusing you?

---

But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.