LogFAQs > #930706353

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	insurance rejects mans $35k bill due to pre-existing conditions
Balrog0 11/25/19 10:56:33 PM #51:	TheGleamEyes posted... Which meant that people could still sign up for STI ~5 years after ACA was signed into law. No, you've just provided evidence of how the administration (via TCJA) changed STI. Folks can still select "Essential" coverage plans if they were willing to shell out more for those benefits. It's actually an example of how the administration and the legislature have changed the ACA overall to undermine the entire argument for why STI should be allowed by your own source. It is true if you try to isolate specific parts of what you shared you can minimize how meaningful that is. --- But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. <cite>Balrog0 posted [p:930706353] in insurance ... [t:78197721]...</cite> <quote>TheGleamEyes posted... </cite> <quote>Which meant that people could still sign up for STI ~5 years after ACA was signed into law. No, you've just provided evidence of how the administration (via TCJA) changed STI. Folks can still select "Essential" coverage plans if they were willing to shell out more for those benefits.</quote> It's actually an example of how the administration and the legislature have changed the ACA overall to undermine the entire argument for why STI should be allowed by your own source. It is true if you try to isolate specific parts of what you shared you can minimize how meaningful that is. --- But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1