LogFAQs > #930701394

I'd have to double check, but Gallagher isn't the one who was pardoned was he? IIRC, he was acquitted of the most serious charges when a witness abruptly changed his testimony on the stand upon gaining immunity but convicted on basically "conduct unbecoming and bringing dishonor to the navy" or some such. He "merely" intervened (or has threatened to, the whole thing is a mess what with the firing of the Secretary of the Navy) to keep the Navy from conducting its own internal discipline proceedings stemming in large part from said conviction.

It was one or two other guys he pardoned who had been convicted of war crimes. ...Unless again, I've mixed a few things up. I mean it's still gross but yeah.

Edit: Oh reading the article past the twitter headline now and he wants those guys campaigning for him too. Shows what I get for even extending the slightest bit of leniency for anything but the worst possible decision.
---

xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?