LogFAQs > #930160234

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topiclol why are people so quick to defend Michael Jackson?
Aaantlion
11/15/19 1:18:48 AM
#22:


Muscles posted...
Mead posted...
Muscles posted...
A lot of people, including me, think he was kinda weird but not a child molester


Either he was or he wasnt

Belief isnt gonna change what happened

But we don't know for certain so all we have is belief


Mead must be confused, since you just said he wasn't. Your statement was pretty clear.

afrodude77 posted...
I feel like he was innocent but just like with r Kelly why aren't the parents being blamed idc if you're the queen of England im not leaving you alone with my kid


Uhhhhh... we know R Kelly did what he did because he recorded himself doing it.

Unbridled9 posted...
Well, that's also sort of the issue. A lot of people can't separate the man from his music or anything of the sort. If he was then they'd say you can't enjoy his music and must be a terrible person if you do. Needless to say this causes a lot of problems because the option of 'yes he was but I still like his music' becomes invalid. Meaning you either like his music and think he wasn't guilty or you think he was guilty and hate his music as a result. No neutral ground.


That's more of an R Kelly issue than a MJ issue because, again, we conclusively know that R Kelly did what he was said to have done.
---
(\/)(\/)|-|
Scientists are finally waking up to what pyramids have known all along.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1