LogFAQs > #929056215

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	People attacking Tulsi is hurting the party credibility .
AdviceMan 10/21/19 3:15:09 PM #91:	cjsdowg posted... AdviceMan posted... The difference between McCarthyism and now is that we have proof that bad faith actors are trying to influence our elections. Even if you think Hilary's accusation is completely without evidence (it isn't), if you have any modicum of self-awareness, you would realize bad faith actors are propping up Tulsi Gabbard. It's entirely possible, I'd argue even likely that Gabbard is aware of this, but it benefits her, so she keeps it going. If those bad faith actors stopped supporting her, she'd be a 0% candidate and she knows it. The reason why I don't like the term Russian asset, even though it may be technically true, is because it's pretty obvious that people don't know what asset means. If Hillary had evidence of this she was how presented it in place of this high school like .. I no SOMEONE is doing SOMETHING wrong. She would have professionally laid all her cards on the table Sure, and I agree it was irresponsible. It wasn't a fake smear though, and that's why the people she attacked like Jill Stein and Tulsi didn't reply with the same words she was accused of. Because the easiest way to shift a conversation if you are accused of something accurate is to say something that is also accurate, but not an answer to initial accusation. For example, if you called me a middle of the road liberal who is okay with the status quo, and I said something like "I'm not unreasonable and have progressive views", I'm not denying what you said, but it sounds like I'm denying what you're saying and the thing I'm saying is accurate. Then I would turn it on you and saying you attacking fellow democrats is what is wrong with America. The thing that makes me chuckle to some degree though is the fact that all these people have been sneak dissing/outwardly dissing Hillary RODHAM Clinton for the better part of four years. Hillary is CLEARLY bitter about it and that's not a good thing, but still, I can understand it, even if I find it wholly inappropriate. --- "I'm not racist but, BLM sure did make me racist." -Skasa I'm just here to offer you advice, take it or leave it. <cite>AdviceMan posted [p:929056215] in People att... [t:78096833]...</cite> <quote>cjsdowg posted...</cite> <quote>AdviceMan posted...</cite> <quote>The difference between McCarthyism and now is that we have proof that bad faith actors are trying to influence our elections. Even if you think Hilary's accusation is completely without evidence (it isn't), if you have any modicum of self-awareness, you would realize bad faith actors are propping up Tulsi Gabbard. It's entirely possible, I'd argue even likely that Gabbard is aware of this, but it benefits her, so she keeps it going. If those bad faith actors stopped supporting her, she'd be a 0% candidate and she knows it. The reason why I don't like the term Russian asset, even though it may be technically true, is because it's pretty obvious that people don't know what asset means.</quote> If Hillary had evidence of this she was how presented it in place of this high school like .. I no SOMEONE is doing SOMETHING wrong. She would have professionally laid all her cards on the table</quote> Sure, and I agree it was irresponsible. It wasn't a fake smear though, and that's why the people she attacked like Jill Stein and Tulsi didn't reply with the same words she was accused of. Because the easiest way to shift a conversation if you are accused of something accurate is to say something that is also accurate, but not an answer to initial accusation. For example, if you called me a middle of the road liberal who is okay with the status quo, and I said something like "I'm not unreasonable and have progressive views", I'm not denying what you said, but it sounds like I'm denying what you're saying and the thing I'm saying is accurate. Then I would turn it on you and saying you attacking fellow democrats is what is wrong with America. The thing that makes me chuckle to some degree though is the fact that all these people have been sneak dissing/outwardly dissing Hillary RODHAM Clinton for the better part of four years. Hillary is CLEARLY bitter about it and that's not a good thing, but still, I can understand it, even if I find it wholly inappropriate. --- "I'm not racist but, BLM sure did make me racist." -Skasa I'm just here to offer you advice, take it or leave it.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1