LogFAQs > #928959140

People here like to call basically any time you have an opinion a 'conspiracy theory' in this topic for some reason, but here you have Hillary Clinton completely making up the idea that Tulsi is "being groomed" to run third party, an actual conspiracy theory by the standards of any of the things I ever claim are called, and you guys just uncritically accept that what she says is true. Tulsi has never made any mention of running third party, says she won't run third party, and quite literally does not have ANYWHERE near the support or monetary backing to run as an independent. The Green Party is the only vehicle by which she realistically could ever hope to run third party, but there isn't any reason to support thinking she would do so, or that she would even win their primary. Howie Hawkins, the presumptive nominee, has been endorsed by Jill Stein and her VP and could easily beat Tulsi. There is no reason to believe what Hillary Clinton said is true about her being groomed to run third party, or that her running third party would even be a threat.

Did Russians boost Jill Stein? sure, there is evidence they did that. They also did it to lots of other candidates. So the only things Tulsi and Jill Stein really have in common here is that they dared to go against her. And again, I mentioned there is evidence to back up why I think this: her 08 loss resulted in her creating a list of the people she felt went against her by the level of betrayal she felt, evidence she can be extremely vindictive. That is a lot more evidence for what I am putting forth than Hillary put forth about Tulsi being groomed to run third party.

---

I'm baby