LogFAQs > #928900955

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Can it be considered a Sloppy Joe without the bun?
Lopen 10/17/19 6:56:55 PM #173:	I'm not really making that argument I'm just saying you can eat it in a bowl and still identify it as a sloppy joe and not something else. If you wanna say sloppy joe is technically the name of the sandwich first and foremost I won't argue with you cause you're not wrong, my disagreement is just whether the bun is integral to identifying it as a sloppy joe. Like the reaction I'd expect to get to "I eat my sloppy joe in a bowl!!!" is "you're weird" not "that's not a sloppy joe." BLT minus bread in a bowl is a crappy salad. Let's be honest only real reason I came out of the woodwork here was the bad BLT and Spaghetti comparisons --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:928900955] in Can it be ... [t:78090486]...</cite> <quote>I'm not really making that argument I'm just saying you can eat it in a bowl and still identify it as a sloppy joe and not something else. If you wanna say sloppy joe is technically the name of the sandwich first and foremost I won't argue with you cause you're not wrong, my disagreement is just whether the bun is integral to identifying it as a sloppy joe. Like the reaction I'd expect to get to "I eat my sloppy joe in a bowl!!!" is "you're weird" not "that's not a sloppy joe." BLT minus bread in a bowl is a crappy salad. Let's be honest only real reason I came out of the woodwork here was the bad BLT and Spaghetti comparisons --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1