LogFAQs > #928895149

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicSo will Gfaqs start banning people for speaking out against China?
Raze_Razel
10/17/19 4:34:54 PM
#85:


As well, no "real" explanation was given on either the first moderation, nor the reason for being upheld.

Automated message says:
Users may not post any content that intentionally antagonizes other users by being inflammatory, irrelevant, disruptive, or offensive


Seriously?....that's how weak you're going to take it?..... the worse thing I said was "shit-talk".... and all the Xuhu started to melt right away? You let Bulbasaur/Destiny/Hellwithoutsin troll on this board with multiple accounts...and your tits are twisted over "shit"?.....please, tell me you have more sense than that.

So like your post here, I know you're hiding behind that "we don't have to explain ourselves" part of the TOU, which gives you all the excuse in the world to avoid responsibility toward whatever intellectual authority you think you have. Yet on the other hand,...you are here......so..

+++

LET'S DO IT.....explain the moderation process here and now. Wipe the slate clean, start from scratch, square one, here we go....

I said, starting a topic on the FFXIV board:

Does shit-talking about China get you banned from this game too?
Since thats Blizzards policy, but since SQEX is of Eastern shores has there been any mass bannings in FFXIV for speaking against China?

Will talking about China in open chat in (ie) Limsa Lominsa get you banned?

Asking for (political) science reasons....


read it, stare at it for a few minutes, soak it in....... I'm expecting a human response here.

it was deleted because "you" said:

MODERATION REASON - TROLLING
Users may not post any content that intentionally antagonizes other users by being inflammatory, irrelevant, disruptive, or offensive


Okay,...so where did I go wrong?

"shit-talking" is the worse thing I've might have said, but that's hardly an issue since you have a profanity blocker on site. And it almost common speech in most of the world too, almost forgivable if the audience is aware of how context and slang works. It sounds reaching on a pathetic level to think "that" was the issue....but if it was, and I chose another word to soothe virgin ears like "protest"? or even "mentioning"? maybe "have open conversation about China"?....you think that'll fly? If I were to repost this exact same subject matter, and edited without "shit", reworded so it's not spamming, it's not going to get modded?

Do I always have to include huge long, drawn out post like #58 here to explain my position on why I am asking such a question? I mean be real here, the average person reading posts on gFAQs can't handle a whole paragraph at any given time. So I kept it short in hopes that the overall meaning and intent would've spoke for itself; apparently not in this case. So would I have to type out large essays that no one would read to avoid moderation? Seems kind of slimy, huh? I mean, you could say "yes", and I'd write a word-salad essay, and the point still won't get across because no one is bothering to read it, so they can't respond to it. And you'd have your troll lackeys to cool the situation. Overall though, you'd rely on your audience's apathy to silence me; interesting notion, ingenius, even diabolical if the motive was more in line with the larger elephant in the room.....
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1