LogFAQs > #927894984

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Formal impeachment inquiry against trump
Mead 09/24/19 7:00:21 PM #9:	Yellow posted... Mead posted... This is more than likely going to hurt democrats. Why do you think party leadership has been so reluctant to begin a formal inquiry? Why would they do it in the first place? I honestly don't know, but it's a waste of time. Because at the bare minimum Trump has openly admitted to committing high crimes and Congress is the only body of oversight in the situation. Its beyond the scope of regular criminal justice. By formally beginning the inquiry Congress now has unilateral power to investigate and call witnesses and there will be actual consequences for anyone that impedes them. --- More malicious than mischievous <cite>Mead posted [p:927894984] in Formal imp... [t:78038994]...</cite> <quote>Yellow posted...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>This is more than likely going to hurt democrats. Why do you think party leadership has been so reluctant to begin a formal inquiry?</quote>Why would they do it in the first place? I honestly don't know, but it's a waste of time. </quote> Because at the bare minimum Trump has openly admitted to committing high crimes and Congress is the only body of oversight in the situation. Its beyond the scope of regular criminal justice. By formally beginning the inquiry Congress now has unilateral power to investigate and call witnesses and there will be actual consequences for anyone that impedes them. --- More malicious than mischievous</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1