LogFAQs > #926215127

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Was Ronald Reagan racist?
HelIWithoutSin 08/18/19 6:02:26 AM #49:	Zeus posted... No, they clearly weren't and I'm not sure what would even give you that completely wrong impression.... although I suspect that you know better and are making shit up again. Well, I got that impression by looking up Mead's posting history and reviewing the timestamps and content for the 24 hours leading up to 4:55pm on August 1, 2019, when you said to him "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." All of his interactions with you were only in that topic, not multiple ones throughout the night. Zeus posted... A few minutes after what? I'm not sure what timeline you're even talking about. Granted, I'm finally going to bed now so that gives you some time to get your story straight and work out a proper lie tying these things together. A few minutes after that comment to Mead. 6 minutes later, to be exact, in your topic on HellHole, you posted "One poster implied that the reviewing mod didn't click the link to the article containing the remark I criticized". So, nowhere in that topic did Mead imply the acting mod didn't read the article. But, even if he did, how does saying "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." as a rebuttal make any sense at all? Zeus posted... Which is why I complained about them. By downplaying his remarks as racists jokes, even though they weren't jokes at all. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:926215127] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>No, they clearly weren't and I'm not sure what would even give you that completely wrong impression.... although I suspect that you know better and are making shit up again. </quote> Well, I got that impression by looking up Mead's posting history and reviewing the timestamps and content for the 24 hours leading up to 4:55pm on August 1, 2019, when you said to him "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." All of his interactions with you were only in that topic, not multiple ones throughout the night. Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>A few minutes after what? I'm not sure what timeline you're even talking about. Granted, I'm finally going to bed now so that gives you some time to get your story straight and work out a proper lie tying these things together. </quote> A few minutes after that comment to Mead. 6 minutes later, to be exact, in your topic on HellHole, you posted "One poster implied that the reviewing mod didn't click the link to the article containing the remark I criticized". So, nowhere in that topic did Mead imply the acting mod didn't read the article. But, even if he did, how does saying "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." as a rebuttal make any sense at all? Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Which is why I complained about them. </quote> By downplaying his remarks as racists jokes, even though they weren't jokes at all. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1