Poll of the Day > Was Ronald Reagan racist?

Topic List	Page List: 1, 2
SkynyrdRocker 08/17/19 9:59:29 PM #1:	Was he? - Results (2 votes) Yes 50% (1 vote) 1 Sí, pero en español 50% (1 vote) 1 Yes <cite>SkynyrdRocker posted [p:926203248] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote> Was he? - Results (2 votes) Yes 50% (1 vote) 1 Sí, pero en español 50% (1 vote) 1 Yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Lokarin 08/17/19 10:02:53 PM #2:	Yes, he made weedle illegal to crush trainer communities --- "Salt cures Everything!" My YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/Nirakolov/videos <cite>Lokarin posted [p:926203361] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Yes, he made weedle illegal to crush trainer communities</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
aHappySacka 08/17/19 10:11:58 PM #3:	I don't care enough to research it myself but that clip of Boondocks explains it well enough. --- You are now blinking and breathing manually. https://media.giphy.com/media/w9anbv8X6xovjNwIub/giphy.gif <cite>aHappySacka posted [p:926203692] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>I don't care enough to research it myself but that clip of Boondocks explains it well enough.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/17/19 10:28:12 PM #4:	Totally, just look at all the systemically racist policies he put in place Oh and he literally called african people monkeys --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926204200] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Totally, just look at all the systemically racist policies he put in place Oh and he literally called african people monkeys </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Blighboy 08/17/19 10:56:49 PM #5:	Mead posted... Totally, just look at all the systemically racist policies he put in place Oh and he literally called african people monkeys He was just making reference to how all humans share a common heritage with the great apes. You'd think the left would know this, but it seems they're willing to use evolution as a weapon and then ignore it when convenient. --- https://imgtc.com/i/gl6tuJ6.png <cite>Blighboy posted [p:926205215] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Totally, just look at all the systemically racist policies he put in place Oh and he literally called african people monkeys </quote> He was just making reference to how all humans share a common heritage with the great apes. You'd think the left would know this, but it seems they're willing to use evolution as a weapon and then ignore it when convenient.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
MarioLinkNES 08/18/19 12:15:19 AM #6:	No. --- I own Tandy,2600,NES,NESv2,GB,SNES,GBC,N64,GBA,SP, NGC,DS,DSL,XL,Wii,3DS,3DSXL,WiiU,NS,SMS,SMS2,SG,SG2,GG, SCD,S32X,SS,SDC,PS1,PS2,PS3,PS4,XBox,360,XO and PC <cite>MarioLinkNES posted [p:926208087] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>No.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 12:16:19 AM #7:	MarioLinkNES posted... No. Is that the full extent of your reasoning? --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926208120] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>MarioLinkNES posted... </cite> <quote>No.</quote> Is that the full extent of your reasoning? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
-Komaiko54- 08/18/19 12:20:47 AM #8:	Not at all --- "I'm touched by the arrow of God that left scars." - CYNE <cite>-Komaiko54- posted [p:926208263] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Not at all</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
JoseAAV 08/18/19 12:40:10 AM #9:	In a thrifty ironic way yes <cite>JoseAAV posted [p:926208901] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>In a thrifty ironic way yes</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
THEGODDAMNBATMA 08/18/19 12:41:39 AM #10:	Not only would I say he was racist, I'd say he was arguably among the most racist of presidents. <cite>THEGODDAMNBATMA posted [p:926208964] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Not only would I say he was racist, I'd say he was arguably among the most racist of presidents. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 08/18/19 12:56:57 AM #11:	That recently uncovered conversation of his made it clear that he indeed was. Not really an issue up for debate at this point. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:926209528] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>That recently uncovered conversation of his made it clear that he indeed was. Not really an issue up for debate at this point.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 2:00:12 AM #12:	Once upon a time, I might have have accused Reagan of being racist, but the mods showed me the error of my ways. In fact, going forward I'm playing it safe and not criticizing Reagan at all. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926211456] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Once upon a time, I might have have accused Reagan of being racist, but the mods showed me the error of my ways. In fact, going forward I'm playing it safe and not criticizing Reagan at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 2:06:17 AM #13:	Zeus peddling fake news again --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926211591] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus peddling fake news again </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 2:07:46 AM #14:	And Mead spinning webs fit to beat any spider. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926211622] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>And Mead spinning webs fit to beat any spider.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 08/18/19 2:43:26 AM #15:	Zeus posted... Once upon a time, I might have have accused Reagan of being racist, but the mods showed me the error of my ways. In fact, going forward I'm playing it safe and not criticizing Reagan at all. o.0 I'm confused. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:926212278] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Once upon a time, I might have have accused Reagan of being racist, but the mods showed me the error of my ways. In fact, going forward I'm playing it safe and not criticizing Reagan at all.</quote> o.0 I'm confused.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 2:59:39 AM #16:	BlackScythe0 posted... o.0 I'm confused. He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926212556] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>o.0 I'm confused.</quote> He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
BlackScythe0 08/18/19 3:10:27 AM #17:	Mead posted... BlackScythe0 posted... o.0 I'm confused. He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke Yea he got modded for the opposite of what he just said. Hence the confusion. <cite>BlackScythe0 posted [p:926212767] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>o.0 I'm confused.</quote> He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke </quote> Yea he got modded for the opposite of what he just said. Hence the confusion.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 3:15:29 AM #18:	Mead posted... BlackScythe0 posted... o.0 I'm confused. He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke Except that's not even close to what I said and you even conceded that after backpedaling and changing your story several times. However, I'm sure that's what you probably spun as a narrative to the mods, not unlike your other willfully malicious misinterpretations. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926212850] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>o.0 I'm confused.</quote> He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke </quote> Except that's not even close to what I said and you even conceded that after backpedaling and changing your story several times. However, I'm sure that's what you probably spun as a narrative to the mods, not unlike your other willfully malicious misinterpretations.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrndNhbrHdCEman 08/18/19 3:16:13 AM #19:	Is Ronald McDonald a clown? --- Official nosy neighbor and gossip https://imgur.com/uGKwGsK <cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted [p:926212864] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Is Ronald McDonald a clown?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrndNhbrHdCEman 08/18/19 3:21:55 AM #20:	Zeus is pretending what Regan said was a joke? Isn't that what got him suspended the last time. Or was that one of 6 alts he yanked out. --- Official nosy neighbor and gossip https://imgur.com/uGKwGsK <cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted [p:926212961] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus is pretending what Regan said was a joke? Isn't that what got him suspended the last time. Or was that one of 6 alts he yanked out.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 3:44:06 AM #21:	Mead posted... Zeus peddling fake news again --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926213373] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Zeus peddling fake news again</quote> </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 3:45:09 AM #22:	Mead posted... Mead posted... Zeus peddling fake news again Zeus posted... Mead spinning webs fit to beat any spider. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926213386] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Mead posted... </cite> <quote>Zeus peddling fake news again</quote> </quote> Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Mead spinning webs fit to beat any spider.</quote></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 3:54:31 AM #23:	Not gonna prove you wrong for a 10th time but everyone who saw the post knows exactly what you said and why you were fairly modded for it The fact that you are still bringing it up all this time later is a bit pathetic tbh --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926213545] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Not gonna prove you wrong for a 10th time but everyone who saw the post knows exactly what you said and why you were fairly modded for it The fact that you are still bringing it up all this time later is a bit pathetic tbh </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 08/18/19 3:56:22 AM #24:	Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you? --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:926213571] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 3:59:40 AM #25:	HelIWithoutSin posted... Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you? That was freaking bananas --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926213623] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>HelIWithoutSin posted... </cite> <quote>Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you?</quote> That was freaking bananas </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 4:03:00 AM #26:	Mead posted... Not gonna prove you wrong for a 10th time but everyone who saw the post knows exactly what you said and why you were fairly modded for it The fact that you are still bringing it up all this time later is a bit pathetic tbh And I explained it in numerous topics already why your lies are flat-out lies. I went into the topic to criticize what Reagan said, you lied and spun it then I got modded. It further demonstrates that your vendetta is wholly personal in nature. HelIWithoutSin posted... Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you? No, I said that somebody implied it. And that person was Mead.... which I literally answered when you brought it up in another topic. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926213665] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Not gonna prove you wrong for a 10th time but everyone who saw the post knows exactly what you said and why you were fairly modded for it The fact that you are still bringing it up all this time later is a bit pathetic tbh </quote> And I explained it in numerous topics already why your lies are flat-out lies. I went into the topic to criticize what Reagan said, you lied and spun it then I got modded. It further demonstrates that your vendetta is wholly personal in nature. HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you?</quote> No, I said that somebody implied it. And that person was Mead.... which I literally answered when you brought it up in another topic.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 4:04:51 AM #27:	Im not sure which is more concerning That he feels the urge to lie this much, or the possibility that he actually believes what he is posting --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926213688] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Im not sure which is more concerning That he feels the urge to lie this much, or the possibility that he actually believes what he is posting </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
FrndNhbrHdCEman 08/18/19 4:06:21 AM #28:	HelIWithoutSin posted... Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you? This one --- Official nosy neighbor and gossip https://imgur.com/uGKwGsK <cite>FrndNhbrHdCEman posted [p:926213708] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>Remember when he said that the "someone" that told him the acting mod didn't even read the article was you?</quote> This one </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 4:08:29 AM #29:	Mead posted... The fact that you are still bringing it up all this time later is a bit pathetic tbh It's not so much a matter of me "bringing it up" as this topic seems designed to re-open that discussion. And yeah, I'm still fucking annoyed by that BS. I post in a topic to criticize racism -- the least controversial thing ever given how clear-cut the situation was --- and you (or somebody, although you top that list of suspects) still manage to spin that shit, turn it upside down, etc, to get me modded. Mead posted... Im not sure which is more concerning That he feels the urge to lie this much, or the possibility that he actually believes what he is posting As for me, I know that you don't actually believe your nonsense and that you're claiming it solely to troll, just as you do with so many other things. You lie, you manipulate, and you spin your little narratives. How many people have you born false witness against over the years? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926213734] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The fact that you are still bringing it up all this time later is a bit pathetic tbh</quote> It's not so much a matter of me "bringing it up" as this topic seems designed to re-open that discussion. And yeah, I'm still fucking annoyed by that BS. I post in a topic to criticize racism -- the least controversial thing ever given how clear-cut the situation was --- and you (or somebody, although you top that list of suspects) still manage to spin that shit, turn it upside down, etc, to get me modded. Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Im not sure which is more concerning That he feels the urge to lie this much, or the possibility that he actually believes what he is posting </quote> As for me, I know that you don't actually believe your nonsense and that you're claiming it solely to troll, just as you do with so many other things. You lie, you manipulate, and you spin your little narratives. How many people have you born false witness against over the years?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 4:16:06 AM #30:	Spin --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926213815] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote> Spin </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 4:19:58 AM #31:	Mead posted... Spin Mead posted... He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke Case-in-point. I roundly criticized Reagan's words as textbook racism and specified that what he said after the racial slur is what really punted the ball. The only thing kinda unclear is that I stopped short of including the racial slur in my quote of your post -- because I was worried about getting modded for including it even in a quote. Meanwhile you completely misrepresented my remarks in this topic (see your above quoted post) and in countless other places, repeatedly reframing them to suggest I meant something I didn't. It was vile trickery on your part, plain and simple, to advance your libelous campaign against me. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926213862] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Spin</quote> Mead posted...</cite> <quote>He got modded for brushing off the Raegan monkey comments as just a joke</quote> Case-in-point. I roundly criticized Reagan's words as textbook racism and specified that what he said after the racial slur is what really punted the ball. The only thing kinda unclear is that I stopped short of including the racial slur in my quote of your post -- because I was worried about getting modded for including it even in a quote. Meanwhile you completely misrepresented my remarks in this topic (see your above quoted post) and in countless other places, repeatedly reframing them to suggest I meant something I didn't. It was vile trickery on your part, plain and simple, to advance your libelous campaign against me.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 4:35:32 AM #32:	Your words speak for themselves --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926214026] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Your words speak for themselves </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#33	Post #33 was unavailable or deleted.
Zeus 08/18/19 4:49:44 AM #34:	Mead posted... Your words speak for themselves Then why do you keep trying to claim I said something else? And why did you changed that something else multiple times when I called you on it in another topic? And why do you keep insisting that I meant something that clearly goes against what I said and, for that matter, contradicts the original article? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926214193] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Your words speak for themselves </quote> Then why do you keep trying to claim I said something else? And why did you changed that something else multiple times when I called you on it in another topic? And why do you keep insisting that I meant something that clearly goes against what I said and, for that matter, contradicts the original article?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 08/18/19 4:51:20 AM #35:	Zeus posted... No, I said that somebody implied it. And that person was Mead.... which I literally answered when you brought it up in another topic. Except he never did in your back and forth exchange. And if he did imply it, how does you telling him the very thing he implied make any sense as a rebuttal? Mead posted... Your words speak for themselves Except when he uses the word "joke" apparently. That's when the word wasn't spoken at all, according to him. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:926214219] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>No, I said that somebody implied it. And that person was Mead.... which I literally answered when you brought it up in another topic.</quote> Except he never did in your back and forth exchange. And if he did imply it, how does you telling him the very thing he implied make any sense as a rebuttal? Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Your words speak for themselves </quote> Except when he uses the word "joke" apparently. That's when the word wasn't spoken at all, according to him.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 4:53:08 AM #36:	And why did you changed that something else multiple times when I called you on it in another topic? I did not do that --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926214231] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote><quote>And why did you changed that something else multiple times when I called you on it in another topic?</quote> I did not do that </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 4:57:18 AM #37:	HelIWithoutSin posted... Except he never did in your back and forth exchange. Except he literally did during a discussion in one of those topics. Keep in mind it was argued in multiple topics that same night. HelIWithoutSin posted... And if he did imply it, how does you telling him the very thing he implied make any sense as a rebuttal? I have no clue what you're trying to ask. HelIWithoutSin posted... That's when the word wasn't spoken at all, according to him. Link to the original article: https://news.yahoo.com/ronald-reagan-racist-audio-nixon-110547900.html Reagan makes hyperbolic claims regarding shoes. The racial slur was only part of that larger quote. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926214283] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>Except he never did in your back and forth exchange. </quote> Except he literally did during a discussion in one of those topics. Keep in mind it was argued in multiple topics that same night. HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>And if he did imply it, how does you telling him the very thing he implied make any sense as a rebuttal?</quote> I have no clue what you're trying to ask. HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>That's when the word wasn't spoken at all, according to him.</quote> Link to the original article: https://news.yahoo.com/ronald-reagan-racist-audio-nixon-110547900.html Reagan makes hyperbolic claims regarding shoes. The racial slur was only part of that larger quote.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 4:59:38 AM #38:	Mead posted... And why did you changed that something else multiple times when I called you on it in another topic? I did not do that Are you insisting that you didn't start by claiming I said "it was just a joke" -- like you falsely claimed here, in full view of the board -- then changing it to other variations not resembling my actual quote? Is that what you're claiming? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926214309] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote><quote>And why did you changed that something else multiple times when I called you on it in another topic?</quote> I did not do that </quote> Are you insisting that you didn't start by claiming I said "it was just a joke" -- like you falsely claimed here, in full view of the board -- then changing it to other variations not resembling my actual quote? Is that what you're claiming?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 5:00:43 AM #39:	The racial slur was the subject of the entire topic. Youre insisting your comment was about a single sentence that no one was even talking about with nothing in your post alluding to anything other than the subject at hand which was him calling African delegates monkeys. You claim you were referring to the shoes thing as a racist joke. I think thats a lie. But even if that is true, you totally fucked up your post by making it seem like you were summing up the monkeys slur as nothing more than a racist joke. fair, next --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926214320] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>The racial slur was the subject of the entire topic. Youre insisting your comment was about a single sentence that no one was even talking about with nothing in your post alluding to anything other than the subject at hand which was him calling African delegates monkeys. You claim you were referring to the shoes thing as a racist joke. I think thats a lie. But even if that is true, you totally fucked up your post by making it seem like you were summing up the monkeys slur as nothing more than a racist joke. fair, next </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 5:01:24 AM #40:	Zeus posted... Are you insisting that you didn't start by claiming I said "it was just a joke" -- like you falsely claimed here, in full view of the board -- then changing it to other variations not resembling my actual quote? Is that what you're claiming? Yeah what are you gonna do about it --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926214330] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted... </cite> <quote>Are you insisting that you didn't start by claiming I said "it was just a joke" -- like you falsely claimed here, in full view of the board -- then changing it to other variations not resembling my actual quote? Is that what you're claiming?</quote> Yeah what are you gonna do about it </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Zeus 08/18/19 5:05:30 AM #41:	Mead posted... The racial slur was the subject of the entire topic. Youre insisting your comment was about a single sentence that no one was even talking about with nothing in your post alluding to anything other than the subject at hand which was him calling African delegates monkeys. You claim you were referring to the shoes thing as a racist joke. I think thats a lie. But even if that is true, you totally fucked up your post by making it seem like you were summing up the monkeys slur as nothing more than a racist joke. fair, next More lies and distortions! First Mead lies about the subject of the topic, which was the link I provided. Literally that was ALL that was in the post. That was 100% of its content. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/77904646 Second, my initial criticism directly reflects Reagan's quote in its entirety. Third, and VERY clearly, my second criticism (during which I quoted you and spelled out that it was more than just the slur that was offensive) references SPECIFICALLY the things said after the slur itself to remove any ambiguity. Do you care to lie again? So far you've lied about what I said. You've lied about what I meant. You've lied about the topic posted. You've lied about the article that topic linked to. Honestly, what's left for you to lie about? --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926214379] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Mead posted...</cite> <quote>The racial slur was the subject of the entire topic. Youre insisting your comment was about a single sentence that no one was even talking about with nothing in your post alluding to anything other than the subject at hand which was him calling African delegates monkeys. You claim you were referring to the shoes thing as a racist joke. I think thats a lie. But even if that is true, you totally fucked up your post by making it seem like you were summing up the monkeys slur as nothing more than a racist joke. fair, next </quote> More lies and distortions! First Mead lies about the subject of the topic, which was the link I provided. Literally that was ALL that was in the post. That was 100% of its content. https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/3-poll-of-the-day/77904646 Second, my initial criticism directly reflects Reagan's quote in its entirety. Third, and VERY clearly, my second criticism (during which I quoted you and spelled out that it was more than just the slur that was offensive) references SPECIFICALLY the things said after the slur itself to remove any ambiguity. Do you care to lie again? So far you've lied about what I said. You've lied about what I meant. You've lied about the topic posted. You've lied about the article that topic linked to. Honestly, what's left for you to lie about?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 08/18/19 5:17:54 AM #42:	Zeus posted... Except he literally did during a discussion in one of those topics. Keep in mind it was argued in multiple topics that same night. His only interactions with you for a full 24 hours were contained in that topic, where you said to him "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." A few minutes later, you posted that "someone" implied the mod never read the article. Also, Reagan's comments on the delegates not wearing shoes were disparaging and condescending remarks, not jokes. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:926214547] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Except he literally did during a discussion in one of those topics. Keep in mind it was argued in multiple topics that same night. </quote> His only interactions with you for a full 24 hours were contained in that topic, where you said to him "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." A few minutes later, you posted that "someone" implied the mod never read the article. Also, Reagan's comments on the delegates not wearing shoes were disparaging and condescending remarks, not jokes.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 5:22:41 AM #43:	Nothing that Ive said has been a lie Zeus, deal with it everyone in that topic was talking about Raegan calling people monkeys because thats a known and extremely offensive slur. Meanwhile you think people should have known you were talking about shoes despite saying nothing about that line in your post Yet the fact that you were modded is some conspiracy that a mod was tricked into. Gimme a break --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926214615] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Nothing that Ive said has been a lie Zeus, deal with it everyone in that topic was talking about Raegan calling people monkeys because thats a known and extremely offensive slur. Meanwhile you think people should have known you were talking about shoes despite saying nothing about that line in your post Yet the fact that you were modded is some conspiracy that a mod was tricked into. Gimme a break </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#44	Post #44 was unavailable or deleted.
Zeus 08/18/19 5:37:51 AM #46:	HelIWithoutSin posted... His only interactions with you for a full 24 hours were contained in that topic, No, they clearly weren't and I'm not sure what would even give you that completely wrong impression.... although I suspect that you know better and are making shit up again. HelIWithoutSin posted... A few minutes later, you posted that "someone" implied the mod never read the article. A few minutes after what? I'm not sure what timeline you're even talking about. Granted, I'm finally going to bed now so that gives you some time to get your story straight and work out a proper lie tying these things together. HelIWithoutSin posted... Also, Reagan's comments on the delegates not wearing shoes were disparaging and condescending Which is why I complained about them. Mead posted... Nothing that Ive said has been a lie Zeus, deal with it Overlooking that you brazenly and irrefutably lied about what I said, considering you posted an image of the actual quote which completely contradicted what you claimed I said. And, you know, your other lies. Mead posted... everyone in that topic was talking about Raegan First off, why do you keep misspelling Reagan? Is this part of a bit you're doing? I'm not sure where you're trying to go with it. Second, the topic was about the ENTIRETY of that article. I responded to the entirety of those remarks, not just the slur. I made that pretty fucking clear in my post as well, specifically where I quoted you. Mead posted... Meanwhile you think people should have known you were talking about shoes despite saying nothing about that line in your post ....you mean except for the part where I specifically reference that part? And again, I didn't post Reagan's quote itself BECAUSE it very heavily violated the TOS and because it was already in the article itself. It's absurdly clear that I talking about more than just the slur which you know because it's literally in the part that I respond to you. Mead posted... Yet the fact that you were modded is some conspiracy that a mod was tricked into. No, I said that a false claim was filed. That's not the same thing as a "conspiracy," given that it would only involve ONE person acting maliciously. Granted, other elements are more than a little suspicious, including the response time to the moderation when the usual response time around here is lethargic. #45 (message deleted) I have no idea why you chose to delete that. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:926214812] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>His only interactions with you for a full 24 hours were contained in that topic,</quote> No, they clearly weren't and I'm not sure what would even give you that completely wrong impression.... although I suspect that you know better and are making shit up again. HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>A few minutes later, you posted that "someone" implied the mod never read the article.</quote> A few minutes after what? I'm not sure what timeline you're even talking about. Granted, I'm finally going to bed now so that gives you some time to get your story straight and work out a proper lie tying these things together. HelIWithoutSin posted...</cite> <quote>Also, Reagan's comments on the delegates not wearing shoes were disparaging and condescending</quote> Which is why I complained about them. Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Nothing that Ive said has been a lie Zeus, deal with it</quote> Overlooking that you brazenly and irrefutably lied about what I said, considering you posted an image of the actual quote which completely contradicted what you claimed I said. And, you know, your other lies. Mead posted...</cite> <quote>everyone in that topic was talking about Raegan</quote> First off, why do you keep misspelling Reagan? Is this part of a bit you're doing? I'm not sure where you're trying to go with it. Second, the topic was about the ENTIRETY of that article. I responded to the entirety of those remarks, not just the slur. I made that pretty fucking clear in my post as well, specifically where I quoted you. Mead posted...</cite> <quote>Meanwhile you think people should have known you were talking about shoes despite saying nothing about that line in your post </quote> ....you mean except for the part where I specifically reference that part? And again, I didn't post Reagan's quote itself BECAUSE it very heavily violated the TOS and because it was already in the article itself. It's absurdly clear that I talking about more than just the slur which you know because it's literally in the part that I respond to you. Mead posted...</cite> <quote> Yet the fact that you were modded is some conspiracy that a mod was tricked into.</quote> No, I said that a false claim was filed. That's not the same thing as a "conspiracy," given that it would only involve ONE person acting maliciously. Granted, other elements are more than a little suspicious, including the response time to the moderation when the usual response time around here is lethargic. <cite>#45 (message deleted)</cite> I have no idea why you chose to delete that.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Mead 08/18/19 5:44:17 AM #47:	I agree with the mod who modded your post --- If they drag you through the mud, it doesnt change whats in your blood <cite>Mead posted [p:926214894] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>I agree with the mod who modded your post </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HornedLion 08/18/19 5:59:45 AM #48:	I think he was super racist. But I cannot judge as I absolutely love casting his spell in Final Fantasy. That 5 HP Per tick helps a lot. --- :) <cite>HornedLion posted [p:926215093] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>I think he was super racist. But I cannot judge as I absolutely love casting his spell in Final Fantasy. That 5 HP Per tick helps a lot.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
HelIWithoutSin 08/18/19 6:02:26 AM #49:	Zeus posted... No, they clearly weren't and I'm not sure what would even give you that completely wrong impression.... although I suspect that you know better and are making shit up again. Well, I got that impression by looking up Mead's posting history and reviewing the timestamps and content for the 24 hours leading up to 4:55pm on August 1, 2019, when you said to him "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." All of his interactions with you were only in that topic, not multiple ones throughout the night. Zeus posted... A few minutes after what? I'm not sure what timeline you're even talking about. Granted, I'm finally going to bed now so that gives you some time to get your story straight and work out a proper lie tying these things together. A few minutes after that comment to Mead. 6 minutes later, to be exact, in your topic on HellHole, you posted "One poster implied that the reviewing mod didn't click the link to the article containing the remark I criticized". So, nowhere in that topic did Mead imply the acting mod didn't read the article. But, even if he did, how does saying "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." as a rebuttal make any sense at all? Zeus posted... Which is why I complained about them. By downplaying his remarks as racists jokes, even though they weren't jokes at all. --- And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer. -Hans Gruber <cite>HelIWithoutSin posted [p:926215127] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>No, they clearly weren't and I'm not sure what would even give you that completely wrong impression.... although I suspect that you know better and are making shit up again. </quote> Well, I got that impression by looking up Mead's posting history and reviewing the timestamps and content for the 24 hours leading up to 4:55pm on August 1, 2019, when you said to him "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." All of his interactions with you were only in that topic, not multiple ones throughout the night. Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>A few minutes after what? I'm not sure what timeline you're even talking about. Granted, I'm finally going to bed now so that gives you some time to get your story straight and work out a proper lie tying these things together. </quote> A few minutes after that comment to Mead. 6 minutes later, to be exact, in your topic on HellHole, you posted "One poster implied that the reviewing mod didn't click the link to the article containing the remark I criticized". So, nowhere in that topic did Mead imply the acting mod didn't read the article. But, even if he did, how does saying "The only conclusion is that the reviewing mod never clicked the link and took your completely false accusation without question." as a rebuttal make any sense at all? Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Which is why I complained about them. </quote> By downplaying his remarks as racists jokes, even though they weren't jokes at all.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
CloudThunder 08/18/19 6:27:53 AM #50:	yes and theres CONCRETE proof.but hes just like most americans. --- *America,Home Of The Dumb* <cite>CloudThunder posted [p:926215386] in Was Ronald... [t:77946134]...</cite> <quote>yes and theres CONCRETE proof.but hes just like most americans.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
#51	Post #51 was unavailable or deleted.
Topic List	Page List: 1, 2

Poll of the Day > Was Ronald Reagan racist? (+) Yeah! (+)

Poll of the Day > Was Ronald Reagan racist?