LogFAQs > #925612201

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	My sister and two cousins are at a mall that has an active shooter
TheWorstPoster 08/04/19 2:54:40 PM #156:	Jen0125 posted... i believe the way in which it's being abused is neglectful because of the advancement in technology. Anything, and everything can, and will be abused, regardless of how advanced in technology it is. Jen0125 posted... the first amendment doesn't involve tools of mass murder and destruction. On the contrary. Ideas are dangerous, and can lead to mass murder. Just look at the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, every tyrannical regime that advocated for genocide. It wasn't the leaders themselves that pulled the trigger, but it was the leaders, and thinkers in their deep cabinet who planted these ideas in that heads. Speech itself has killed hundreds of millions, because it can and will influence others to do so. Why else do you think "hate speech" is suppressed in almost all places online. Free speech is dangerous. So dangerous, it has collapsed many civilizations, because it underminded authority, and gave people justifications for mass murder. It was REVOLUTIONARY at the time to allow for unlimited speech. Jen0125 posted... the nsa, cia and dhs are abusing their powers as well and this abuse goes down even to local police departments. the 4th amendment isn't even protecting against that. Really? Because as far as I can tell, you demanded that these agencies pop up everywhere to "protect us". If you want the Second Amendment gone, you might as well get rid of them all. Why stop at one when you want to feel "safe". Jen0125 posted... what the fuck are you even talking about fish for? do you ever get tired of being absolutely wrong and ignorant about literally everything you talk about? not to mention HYPOCRITICAL. how is all that welfare money working out for you? Environmentalism is what I was hinting at, genius. Ever wonder why plastic bags, plastic straws, and excessive regulations are being put here to begin with, even though we are not even CLOSE to the top 10 biggest polluters on the planet? Or how about taxes for soda, or banning people from buying or owning things that might be "bad for them"? That is governmental overreach. Why give people freedom to do what they want, buy what they want, and live how they want, without the Nanny State coming in and holding their hand, banning absolutely everything there is, because of some theory that has been repeatedly disproven, or simply because the mayor or governor didn't like it, even though it's legal? <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:925612201] in My sister ... [t:77911985]...</cite> <quote>Jen0125 posted...</cite> <quote>i believe the way in which it's being abused is neglectful because of the advancement in technology.</quote> Anything, and everything can, and will be abused, regardless of how advanced in technology it is. Jen0125 posted...</cite> <quote>the first amendment doesn't involve tools of mass murder and destruction.</quote> On the contrary. Ideas are dangerous, and can lead to mass murder. Just look at the Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, every tyrannical regime that advocated for genocide. It wasn't the leaders themselves that pulled the trigger, but it was the leaders, and thinkers in their deep cabinet who planted these ideas in that heads. Speech itself has killed hundreds of millions, because it can and will influence others to do so. Why else do you think "hate speech" is suppressed in almost all places online. Free speech is dangerous. So dangerous, it has collapsed many civilizations, because it underminded authority, and gave people justifications for mass murder. It was REVOLUTIONARY at the time to allow for unlimited speech. Jen0125 posted...</cite> <quote> the nsa, cia and dhs are abusing their powers as well and this abuse goes down even to local police departments. the 4th amendment isn't even protecting against that.</quote> Really? Because as far as I can tell, you demanded that these agencies pop up everywhere to "protect us". If you want the Second Amendment gone, you might as well get rid of them all. Why stop at one when you want to feel "safe". Jen0125 posted...</cite> <quote>what the fuck are you even talking about fish for? do you ever get tired of being absolutely wrong and ignorant about literally everything you talk about? not to mention HYPOCRITICAL. how is all that welfare money working out for you? </quote> Environmentalism is what I was hinting at, genius. Ever wonder why plastic bags, plastic straws, and excessive regulations are being put here to begin with, even though we are not even CLOSE to the top 10 biggest polluters on the planet? Or how about taxes for soda, or banning people from buying or owning things that might be "bad for them"? That is governmental overreach. Why give people freedom to do what they want, buy what they want, and live how they want, without the Nanny State coming in and holding their hand, banning absolutely everything there is, because of some theory that has been repeatedly disproven, or simply because the mayor or governor didn't like it, even though it's legal?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1