LogFAQs > #924576779

Well, that review seemed to be aware of that and specifically drew a contrast between 3H and Fates.

Mind you, given they had only played one route and just started a second I'm still a bit of a skeptic that that is an authoritative take, but it is a positive sign to me that the reviewer (1)Knew to make the comparison to Fates, (2)Criticized Fates for doing a bad job of it, and yet (3)Was still positive about 3H's try at it.

I mean, we'll see. I still don't really expect it to be some wildly divergent thing like all the "3 games in 1!" talk but in a way that might be a good thing because that's less room to go way off the rails (looking at you revelations.)
---

xp1337: Don't you wish there was a spell-checker that told you when you a word out?