LogFAQs > #922286711

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Baking a cake for a same-sex wedding? No!
TrevorBlack79 05/23/19 6:48:44 PM #72:	burritosatan posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... burritosatan posted... Or, the baker obeys the law like they agreed to when they opened their business, and leaves their agenda out of it. So they should leave their agenda aside... in order to appease you and your agenda? My "agenda" is buying a custom cake from a bakery that provides custom cakes. Again, the baker already agreed to obey the law when they opened their business. You are literally arguing that bakers should inexplicably be given free reign to defy laws that literally every other business is required to obey. Why? If I was the Baker and I disagreed with a client I'd just bake the cake after they paid in full and sell the names wrong out of spite. Or accidentally drop it. Same end result but you're off the hook and then their agenda didnt win in the end Then you're refunding the cost, wasting your own time and supplies, and likely paying damages to the couple who's event was negatively impacted by your "carelessness." Even absent damages, you've cost yourself a great deal...so..."Haha take that, liberals!" Or something. I'm guessing you thought you had a point here? I Like Toast posted... TrevorBlack79 posted... Again, the baker already agreed to obey the law when they opened their business. https://www.freedomforallamericans.org/states/ Obviously we're discussing this issue in the context of cities and states that provide these protections. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1 <cite>TrevorBlack79 posted [p:922286711] in Baking a c... [t:77735488]...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>burritosatan posted...</cite> <quote><quote>Or, the baker obeys the law like they agreed to when they opened their business, and leaves their agenda out of it.</quote> So they should leave their agenda aside... in order to appease you and your agenda?</quote> My "agenda" is buying a custom cake from a bakery that provides custom cakes. Again, the baker already agreed to obey the law when they opened their business. You are literally arguing that bakers should inexplicably be given free reign to defy laws that literally every other business is required to obey. Why?</quote> If I was the Baker and I disagreed with a client I'd just bake the cake after they paid in full and sell the names wrong out of spite. Or accidentally drop it. Same end result but you're off the hook and then their agenda didnt win in the end</quote> Then you're refunding the cost, wasting your own time and supplies, and likely paying damages to the couple who's event was negatively impacted by your "carelessness." Even absent damages, you've cost yourself a great deal...so..."Haha take that, liberals!" Or something. I'm guessing you thought you had a point here? <cite>I Like Toast posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote>Again, the baker already agreed to obey the law when they opened their business. </quote> https://www.freedomforallamericans.org/states/</quote> Obviously we're discussing this issue in the context of cities and states that provide these protections. --- "a minority is someone who you can tell off the bat they are black/hispanic/colored. LGBT isn't a minority" - Blakkheim1</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1