LogFAQs > #922281590

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Baking a cake for a same-sex wedding? No!
GasMonkey 05/23/19 4:52:51 PM #33:	TrevorBlack79 posted... DarkRoast posted... they did offer wedding cakes for the gay couple, just not the design the gay couple wanted. Which case are you talking about? What was the specific design that was refused, and would have been provided to a straight couple? dude, forcing someone to do something is wrong no matter what it is. screw your personal bias. its wrong to force a woman to carry a rape baby, its wrong to force somebody to labor for your whims. removing choice is wrong. is it dickish to not make a cake because of personal beliefs? probably. but thats the choice being made. you cant hold a stance that allows one group of people to have a choice and others not, even if it rustles jimmys. thats being hypocritical and not having an internal consisity. --- life at 165mph <cite>GasMonkey posted [p:922281590] in Baking a c... [t:77735488]...</cite> <quote><cite>TrevorBlack79 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DarkRoast posted...</cite> <quote>they did offer wedding cakes for the gay couple, just not the design the gay couple wanted. </quote> Which case are you talking about? What was the specific design that was refused, and would have been provided to a straight couple?</quote> dude, forcing someone to do something is wrong no matter what it is. screw your personal bias. its wrong to force a woman to carry a rape baby, its wrong to force somebody to labor for your whims. removing choice is wrong. is it dickish to not make a cake because of personal beliefs? probably. but thats the choice being made. you cant hold a stance that allows one group of people to have a choice and others not, even if it rustles jimmys. thats being hypocritical and not having an internal consisity. --- life at 165mph</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1