LogFAQs > #921121435

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, Database 5 ( 01.01.2019-12.31.2019 ), DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPotdMon: Nerd/Geek
WhiskeyDisk
04/27/19 12:18:02 AM
#173:


Entity13 posted...
Not denying what you're saying there either, Whiskey, but Solo was still fine for what it was. It just wasn't necessary. Again, there's my point. RO and Solo didn't need to be made. RO at least gave us emotional investment to give a damn, but again there were decisions in there the general audience couldn't help but scratch their heads over. Solo could have been dropped by the second or third major issue in production--something, by the way, that we're now seeing with the new Picard show before it's even made--but Disney just kept going with it, because how can the Star Wars name possibly fail? Oh, right, a lack of direction or necessity.

And then the fatigue set in for people.


Half the problem with the Picard series is letting Frakes direct it.

Do you remember the Frakes-directed episodes of TNG, DS9, and VOY?

'nuff said.
---
The SBA has closed for business, we thank you for your patronage Assassins.
~there's always free cheese in a mousetrap.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1