LogFAQs > #914983537

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Come to think of it, why was Ocarina of Time a thing?
Skye Reynolds 12/31/18 2:08:15 PM #12:	True, the game had moments of levity. And I think that's fair. I think it's okay to have a side quest with masks, singing frogs, a dancing scarecrow, or minor character who functions as comic relief (not Tingle). But the general tone was one of adventure with a stalwart protagonist. The visuals had an earthy vibe to them suggesting a quest of great consequence. It had a tone more in line with something like Robin Hood or Lord of the Rings than Mario-with-a-sword or Nintendo's version of Peter Pan. It'd be like if Super Mario 64 had an almost urban look to it, a sort of faux-grittiness, and then they went right back to the colorful visuals of the Super Nintendo era. It doesn't make sense unless it underperformed. <cite>Skye Reynolds posted [p:914983537] in Come to th... [t:77349636]...</cite> <quote>True, the game had moments of levity. And I think that's fair. I think it's okay to have a side quest with masks, singing frogs, a dancing scarecrow, or minor character who functions as comic relief (not Tingle). But the general tone was one of adventure with a stalwart protagonist. The visuals had an earthy vibe to them suggesting a quest of great consequence. It had a tone more in line with something like Robin Hood or Lord of the Rings than Mario-with-a-sword or Nintendo's version of Peter Pan. It'd be like if Super Mario 64 had an almost urban look to it, a sort of faux-grittiness, and then they went right back to the colorful visuals of the Super Nintendo era. It doesn't make sense unless it underperformed.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1