LogFAQs > #914581014

XIII_rocks posted...

Example of "wait and see" working: women's revolution. The initial 3-on-3-on-3 thing with the Bellas was dreadful and went on for months. People claimed the revolution had failed and that it had been a disaster. However, it was ultimately only a temporary thing and it led to the women having probably the MotN at Wrestlemania.

All I'm going to say is that there is absolutely no reason why any fan of anything should have to suffer through something as awful as those 3-on-3-on-3 storylines that went on for months and be expected to wait and see.

If something sucks, they should rightly be called out for it. But they shouldn't be excused for making people sit through abject garbage like that storyline so they could eventually make something people might want to enjoy. What they should be doing is not making garbage and instead make something people enjoy so we don't even have to have these conversations and taking a "wait and see" approach. Like why should we pat them on the back for making something bad just because eventually, months later, they managed to do something right with it? And why should we have to be optimistic about something because sometimes, occasionally, maybe, they might actually turn a bad thing into something okay?

WWE created this attitude with their fans. If they made good content then people wouldn't complain nearly as much. That's not even an argument. And if that is an argument you'd want to make, then my response to it is that once WWE makes steady, good content, you can "wait and see" if the attitude of the fans change.
---

Check out my entertainment blog!: www.heroicbiz.com
I discuss video games, comics, movies, and TV!