LogFAQs > #914287725

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	All-Purpose Wrestling Topic 464: Keep Her Name Out Your Mouth
Lopen 12/17/18 4:14:55 PM #157:	Eddv posted... Well the women went from "diversity initiative" to "legitimately the best thing going" which is largely due to how big of a star and how quick of a study Ronda has been and Becky and Charlotte both REALLY elevating their games. My point is I think in terms of influence it'd be "everything else on the show tanking that much that a decent women's division is the highlight" > "WWE's token effort to make you believe they're taking things seriously with actual main event slots once in a while" > "the actual quality of the division" I mean it's probably the best it's ever been but only slightly so. I wouldn't say it's off on an island compared to 2016 or 2017. And put it another way if WWE were actually Women's Wrestling Entertainment I wouldn't watch it, currently. Well I scarcely watch WWE as it is so that should go without saying. That being said I wish they would actually use their abundance of money and frivolous hirings to hire enough good women's hands to flesh out the divisions a bit instead of giving the same handful of mix and match matches ad nauseam. Like they just don't have enough competent women to match the amount of exposure they give them, currently, and them feeling like a highlight is a symptom of the show being bad as much as anything. That's just how I feel, though. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:914287725] in All-Purpos... [t:77309134]...</cite> <quote><cite>Eddv posted...</cite> <quote>Well the women went from "diversity initiative" to "legitimately the best thing going" which is largely due to how big of a star and how quick of a study Ronda has been and Becky and Charlotte both REALLY elevating their games.</quote> My point is I think in terms of influence it'd be "everything else on the show tanking that much that a decent women's division is the highlight" > "WWE's token effort to make you believe they're taking things seriously with actual main event slots once in a while" > "the actual quality of the division" I mean it's probably the best it's ever been but only slightly so. I wouldn't say it's off on an island compared to 2016 or 2017. And put it another way if WWE were actually Women's Wrestling Entertainment I wouldn't watch it, currently. Well I scarcely watch WWE as it is so that should go without saying. That being said I wish they would actually use their abundance of money and frivolous hirings to hire enough good women's hands to flesh out the divisions a bit instead of giving the same handful of mix and match matches ad nauseam. Like they just don't have enough competent women to match the amount of exposure they give them, currently, and them feeling like a highlight is a symptom of the show being bad as much as anything. That's just how I feel, though. --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1