LogFAQs > #913655707

That is nice, never said he was correct.

The issue is equating his assertion with an unintended meaning like that he wants to ban makeup.

I find no evidence of that suggestion. Do you?

Like the quora guy did some work:

Peterson expressed his views on makeup in an interview with VICE magazine () which in summary form are:

Women wear makeup to simulate or accentuate the markers of sexual arousal e.g. make lips redder.

Makeup, therefore, has the effect of sexualizing the workplace.

This doesnt mean Peterson condones banning of makeup in the workplace; he prefers liberty vs. Maoist forced androgynous look.

Rather, makeup is an indicator that we havent carefully examined the spectrum of sexualized behavior in the workplace and clearly specified the rules of engagement between men and women.

But do you not see the issue with lazy analysis that claims he says things he doesn't, doubles down when called out with assertion of alt right like metralo above lmao, and then gives JP a point to say people maliciously take him out of context?
---

chill02 to me: you are beautiful