LogFAQs > #913591492

JanwayDaahl posted...

It's not as simple as you're making it out to be. Their lawmakers understandably consider this a slippery slope (which it is), so they are taking measures to stop that.

A slippery slope to... women not being completely subservient to their husbands? Oh no! Not that! better lock up those menaces to society. There's no telling the chaos and havoc they could wreak.

JanwayDaahl posted...

To be honest, most of the male feminists I've seen who say the things you say are the biggest incels I've seen. I see them regularly at my workplace too- they're usually overweight guys who have never had much luck with women, so they fall back to this sort of behavior as a last ditch effort.

Incels are distinct from lonely virgins. Lonely virgins that don't lash out at the world and harbour violent rage toward women for denying them sex aren't incels. Those who promote a world in which women are subservient and exist primarily for husband-sexing, however, are.

JanwayDaahl posted...

How is it unfair if it's true? It's much easier for me as a woman to have sex than it is for a man to have sex.

And that reality exists because of the double standard wherein men are permitted to enjoy and seek out sex and women are expected to tolerate and withhold it (except from their husbands). Fix that double standard, and the whole "key/lock" thing stops being at all applicable for non-reproductive sex (i.e. the vast majority of sex in the developed world) and never used again except by sexist dinks (who are the main ones that use it now).
---

This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.