LogFAQs > #913392649

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Stan By Geek
Zeus 12/02/18 12:56:15 AM #91:	I_Abibde posted... WhiskeyDisk posted... I'm getting sick of everyone and their asshole brother starting their own streaming service. Unfortunately, a bubble has to swell before it can burst, and this is most assuredly a bubble. Yeah, it's gone way overboard. It'll be interesting to see which services survive the bloodbath. CyborgSage00x0 posted... The funny thing is, there's no guarantee that DD goes to Disney+, either. It could be related to the issues of rights, depending on how long the Marvel and Netflix deal was. That said, the Daredevil producers were completely caught by surprise by the cancellation. Season 4 was already in the pre-planning stages. Which would suggest a content rights issue is unlikely to be the reason why. Even stranger, they said that Daredevil (as in, at least the characters) would be returning in some form for a "new adventure" which means....they want to keep using the characters, but not in the current Daredevil show format they made? Reminds me of how Disney tanked the Spectacular Spiderman cartoon. CyborgSage00x0 posted... That said, Disney is probably the on;y company that can get away with this. I highly doubt a Dreamworks or WB Stream ever happen. Disney has a huge library, with hits that are apart of the American fabric, as well as the monoliths that are Marvel and Star Wars. They've already announced a Loki/Scarlet Witch cross-over, as well as Falcon/Hawkeye for Disney+. So they have an innate star-power advantage. Then again, apparently Disney+ is supposed to be "family friendly"...so more Disney Channel, just in streaming format, than anything. That might stunt its reach a little bit. For now, I have zero plans on getting Disney+, especially if it's supposed to be more focused on children programming. Even with SW and Marvel, I'm not entirely sure Disney could pull this off. CyborgSage00x0 posted... Any who...with a month left, so far this year I have seen/completed: 56 films (25 seens in theaters, 33 from this year, 10 with MoviePass) 22 TV Seasons 10 Video Games 4 Books My consumption was like nothing this year.... or was it? Not really sure. I know I didn't really finish any games, but I guess I got through a bunch of tv seasons and probably have an okay number of films done as well. Also started but didn't finish a lot of books =x CyborgSage00x0 posted... Korruptor posted... Hasn't Disney just acquired Hulu from buying the majority of Fox? Yes, which I had thought would mean they would just use Hulu to host Disney stuff. Evidently not. Of course not, because that would make sense >_> --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:913392649] in Stan By Ge... [t:77228690]...</cite> <quote><cite>I_Abibde posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WhiskeyDisk posted...</cite> <quote>I'm getting sick of everyone and their asshole brother starting their own streaming service.</quote> Unfortunately, a bubble has to swell before it can burst, and this is most assuredly a bubble.</quote> Yeah, it's gone way overboard. It'll be interesting to see which services survive the bloodbath. <cite>CyborgSage00x0 posted...</cite> <quote>The funny thing is, there's no guarantee that DD goes to Disney+, either. It could be related to the issues of rights, depending on how long the Marvel and Netflix deal was. That said, the Daredevil producers were completely caught by surprise by the cancellation. Season 4 was already in the pre-planning stages. Which would suggest a content rights issue is unlikely to be the reason why. Even stranger, they said that Daredevil (as in, at least the characters) would be returning in some form for a "new adventure" which means....they want to keep using the characters, but not in the current Daredevil show format they made?</quote> Reminds me of how Disney tanked the Spectacular Spiderman cartoon. <cite>CyborgSage00x0 posted...</cite> <quote>That said, Disney is probably the on;y company that can get away with this. I highly doubt a Dreamworks or WB Stream ever happen. Disney has a huge library, with hits that are apart of the American fabric, as well as the monoliths that are Marvel and Star Wars. They've already announced a Loki/Scarlet Witch cross-over, as well as Falcon/Hawkeye for Disney+. So they have an innate star-power advantage. Then again, apparently Disney+ is supposed to be "family friendly"...so more Disney Channel, just in streaming format, than anything. That might stunt its reach a little bit. For now, I have zero plans on getting Disney+, especially if it's supposed to be more focused on children programming. </quote> Even with SW and Marvel, I'm not entirely sure Disney could pull this off. <cite>CyborgSage00x0 posted...</cite> <quote>Any who...with a month left, so far this year I have seen/completed: 56 films (25 seens in theaters, 33 from this year, 10 with MoviePass) 22 TV Seasons 10 Video Games 4 Books </quote> My consumption was like nothing this year.... or was it? Not really sure. I know I didn't really finish any games, but I guess I got through a bunch of tv seasons and probably have an okay number of films done as well. Also started but didn't finish a lot of books =x <cite>CyborgSage00x0 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Korruptor posted...</cite> <quote>Hasn't Disney just acquired Hulu from buying the majority of Fox?</quote> Yes, which I had thought would mean they would just use Hulu to host Disney stuff. Evidently not.</quote> Of course not, because that would make sense >_> --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1