LogFAQs > #913133999

ZeldaTPLink posted...

It's so easy to call someone an idiot after the result of a match.

I'd like to see people have the balls to do that before the match.

Plenty of people do!

I'm just glad to be on the right side of one of these; normally when my opinions deviate far from the consensus, I'm the one that's wrong. Even I felt like my Pikachu upset pick was just wishful thinking, but this always felt like it would be close to me.

This result vindicates Charizard, by the way. Turns out that Zero's 44% on Mega 1v1 and subsequent heavy LFF allowing Cube to beat Mega in '08 may not have been rSFF after all; Zero is legitimately that strong! It was just LPF in 2013.

I still have no idea what happened against Terra this year, but everything that made Charizard look bad in 2013 can easily be explained away now. Remember the first match that Charizard looked "bad" in? It was against Zelda and Donkey Kong. Okay, granted, DK's performance against Vivi suggests that the upset of Leon is probably less DK boost and more Leon deboost (though it's also a bit of DK boost), but everyone's been talking Zelda up as a Noble Nine Breaker this year. And Bowser has always been a near-elite, so 43.45% on him is not bad. I don't deny that Charizard was never as good as he looked in his debut contest, but I feel it can officially be said: Charizard is not a fraud.
---

"Someday I'll catch up, and then you'll all be surprised!"
BKSheikah has the power. He is the one.