LogFAQs > #912145136

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump Supporter is FIRED after he wore this SHOCKING SHIRT to Voting Day!!!
Zeus 11/10/18 1:45:15 AM #42:	ASlaveObeys posted... Are you just being argumentative? I didn't say anything contradicting what you said and you in fact just reiterated a lot of the points I made with different language. It doesn't matter how he ended up on social media, they have the policies in place in case it ends up on social media. Are you just pointing out that it applies to any position/job? Maybe I'm missing something. You're talking about a policy regarding social media when this isn't about social media. And you were specifying a field when it works more broadly. kangolcone posted... How about from the other perspective. A black patient who sees that picture and then has that nurse may not feel comfortable in that situation. And how exactly would they be seeing that picture? BlackScythe0 posted... Not at all. Just having a confederate shirt would be enough to feel uncomfortable around someone, but the noose? That solidifies it. Calling a noose together with a hate symbol "Mississippi justice"? It's not something difficult to understand, it specifically brings up a dark history. This week in revisionist history: Lynching is now exclusive to blacks! Burn those history books, kids, they don't tell the truth that BlackScythe knows in his heart to be true! Or maybe you just feel that stuff is inappropriate when it involves blacks? Are you implying that it's okay when it happens to whites? Because "lynching is wrong" is understandable, but "lynching is only wrong when it happens to blacks" is a little fucked up. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. <cite>Zeus posted [p:912145136] in Trump Supp... [t:77185265]...</cite> <quote><cite>ASlaveObeys posted...</cite> <quote>Are you just being argumentative? I didn't say anything contradicting what you said and you in fact just reiterated a lot of the points I made with different language. It doesn't matter how he ended up on social media, they have the policies in place in case it ends up on social media. Are you just pointing out that it applies to any position/job? Maybe I'm missing something.</quote> You're talking about a policy regarding social media when this isn't about social media. And you were specifying a field when it works more broadly. <cite>kangolcone posted...</cite> <quote>How about from the other perspective. A black patient who sees that picture and then has that nurse may not feel comfortable in that situation. </quote> And how exactly would they be seeing that picture? <cite>BlackScythe0 posted...</cite> <quote>Not at all. Just having a confederate shirt would be enough to feel uncomfortable around someone, but the noose? That solidifies it. Calling a noose together with a hate symbol "Mississippi justice"? It's not something difficult to understand, it specifically brings up a dark history. </quote> This week in revisionist history: Lynching is now exclusive to blacks! Burn those history books, kids, they don't tell the truth that BlackScythe knows in his heart to be true! Or maybe you just feel that stuff is inappropriate when it involves blacks? Are you implying that it's okay when it happens to whites? Because "lynching is wrong" is understandable, but "lynching is only wrong when it happens to blacks" is a little fucked up. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| There are precious few at ease / With moral ambiguities / So we act as though they don't exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1