LogFAQs > #910407854

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, Database 4 ( 07.23.2018-12.31.2018 ), DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Soo...two years in, what has Trump done so far?
TheWorstPoster 10/12/18 12:52:31 PM #26:	GanglyKhan posted... TheWorstPoster posted... Got out of the worthless Paris Climate Agreement deal which is nothing more than billions of dollars in taxes disguised as an anti-pollution effort. I don't understand the internal logic you're using here. Correct me if I'm wrong, genuinely mean that, but attempting to enforce "greener" standards by imposing restrictions IS an anti-pollution effort. Maybe I just read that wrong, to me, it sounds like you're saying it's not an effort at all and just is disguised to look like on. It's nothing more than excessive taxes and regulations by bureaucrats, in order to stifle the free markets, in order for them to enact control over it. Do you honestly believe that rich men and women in suits could legislate pollution away, especially based off of speculative science that has not been proven, but also does absolutely nothing about the most polluting countries in the world (Russia, China, and India)? It's Virtue Signalling at its worst. Remember, back in the 70's, we were expected to go into an Ice Age by 2000, before it changed to Global Warming, where the narrative said that the Polar Ice Caps would be melted in 12 years (never mind the fact that it would take tens of thousands of years to do so), all because the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere reportedly went up from 400 parts per million to 450 parts per million (and that is hundred, NOT hundred-thousand). It is nothing more than an economic power-grab by government, all with the false pretense of "saving the planet". If they wanted to actually do something, why not go after Russia, India, and China? <cite>TheWorstPoster posted [p:910407854] in Soo...two ... [t:77091093]...</cite> <quote><cite>GanglyKhan posted...</cite> <quote><cite>TheWorstPoster posted...</cite> <quote>Got out of the worthless Paris Climate Agreement deal which is nothing more than billions of dollars in taxes disguised as an anti-pollution effort.</quote> I don't understand the internal logic you're using here. Correct me if I'm wrong, genuinely mean that, but attempting to enforce "greener" standards by imposing restrictions IS an anti-pollution effort. Maybe I just read that wrong, to me, it sounds like you're saying it's not an effort at all and just is disguised to look like on.</quote> It's nothing more than excessive taxes and regulations by bureaucrats, in order to stifle the free markets, in order for them to enact control over it. Do you honestly believe that rich men and women in suits could legislate pollution away, especially based off of speculative science that has not been proven, but also does absolutely nothing about the most polluting countries in the world (Russia, China, and India)? It's Virtue Signalling at its worst. Remember, back in the 70's, we were expected to go into an Ice Age by 2000, before it changed to Global Warming, where the narrative said that the Polar Ice Caps would be melted in 12 years (never mind the fact that it would take tens of thousands of years to do so), all because the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere reportedly went up from 400 parts per million to 450 parts per million (and that is hundred, NOT hundred-thousand). It is nothing more than an economic power-grab by government, all with the false pretense of "saving the planet". If they wanted to actually do something, why not go after Russia, India, and China?</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1